Calusarul

Welcome!

Hello, Calusarul, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 23:35, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Şablon

Şablonul meu

Tools

{{Calusarul_of_box}}

Categoy:Romanian Musicians

Hi, I saw you created Categoy:Romanian Musicians. I have nominated it for deletion. Not that the page already exists at Category:Romanian musicians. You made a mistake in that you spelt "category" slightly wrong. If you've any messages/questions, please feel free to leave them on my talk page. Cheers :) - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 23:35, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

OK, thanks and sorry. I created it twice, I am not well accostumed with wikipedia editing.

Please give me a link where I could post my opinion about improving wikipedia editing for dumb user such as myself. Thanks again. Calusarul (talk) 23:39, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I don't quite understand your question :/. The category for all the different genres is Category:Romanian musicians by genre. The category you attempted to create (Categoy:Romanian Musicians, already exists at Category:Romanian musicians, so if we delete the one you created everything should be back to normal again. As to easier editing, there's a couple of things you could try to help. For example, you could try wikiEd. Cheers - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 23:51, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Thanks, I got it now as far as categories are concerned. I'll see how that WikiEd can help me from now on.Calusarul (talk) 23:56, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Great, hope to see you around on the 'pedia :). If you need help with anything in the future please feel free to use my talk page :) - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 00:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

re: How to translate

Hi there again :). Splitting a page in half, with one half being English, and the other being a different language, is not possible. We're the English Wikipedia, so all our articles are in English. But, you can still do translating. If you want to translate articles in different languages, try this page, where users list pages which are currently in a different language (and then other users translate them). As well as this, there are other language wikipedias, you can see them all if you go to List of Wikipedias. It is possible to create pages on wikipedias, which are translated versions of pages on a different language Wikipedia, as explained at this page if that makes sense. Hope all that helps :) - Kingpin¹³ (talk) 16:03, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Re:Romanian surnames

Hello. I was removing some of the un-referenced lists. The Romanian names were tagged since May 2009 as being unreferenced. That article gets so many edits every week, with people adding and removing names at random, that it can't be considered reliable at all. So that was why I removed some of the countries. If you know of a reliable web site, or something, that lists the common names of Romania or any other Country, then I don't see how anyone can have any problems with you adding to the article.--Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 06:59, 19 February 2010 (UTC)

Algos

Hey there, thanks for pointing out :) but I can't remember asking what the P in X means, because I knew the chi ro for a quite some time. Could you perhaps point out who or what Algos is (with a link to my question perhaps)? I can't find it in my contributions. Hope to hear from you soon! Mallerd (talk) 10:47, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

O sorry, you were right. I didn't know it was a user and I saw my question on his talkpage. 2007 was quite some time ago :P I learned shortly after that moment. I thank you for you help :) Have a nice weekend Mallerd (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Glad to help :) Calusarul (talk) 22:49, 20 February 2010 (UTC)

Romanian flags

I suggest reading WP:SOURCES. You'll find there that Wikipedia articles should be based on "reliable, third-party (independent), published sources with a reputation for fact-checking and accuracy ... In general, the best sources have a professional structure in place for checking or analyzing facts, legal issues, evidence, and arguments; as a rule of thumb, the greater the degree of scrutiny given to these issues, the more reliable the source. Academic and peer-reviewed publications are usually the most reliable sources where available, such as in history". The policy goes on to say that "Questionable sources are those with a poor reputation for checking the facts, or with no editorial oversight".

Does inventatori.ro have an editorial process? Does iancu.ro? No, they're personal websites. What they say may be true, but the standard is verifiability, not truth. - 69.163.222.199 (talk) 15:36, 18 May 2010 (UTC)

The story that Petrache Poenaru invented the Romanian flag after seeing the French one while traveling trough France is pure fantasy. The first tricolor flag appeared in 1834 as a creation of (probably) the domnitor Alexandru Dimitrie Ghica. Alex:D (talk) 13:40, 4 June 2010 (UTC)

Why do you think that story is pure fantasy? I mean, someone must have created that flag. Is there any proof that someone else creted it or that Poenaru definetly didn't? I'm not Poenaru's relative, I just heard someone say that he designed the flag and found a few websites that stated the same thing. Now, I have no idea if they're credible or not. Căluşaru' (talk) 08:38, 13 June 2010 (UTC)

Span

text text text text text text text Căluşaru' (talk) 13:29, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

text text text text text

<spoiler>text of text</spolier>

List

• unu
• doi
• trei
• ...

List

• text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text texttext text text text text text text text text text text texttext text texttext text text text text texttext text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text text

Collapsing

Partea I

Extended content

Jinn şi Phyllis, un cuplu de călători în spaţiu, găsesc un manuscris închis într-o sticlă şi află că în anul 2500 profesorul Antelle a organizat o expediţie pentru explorarea unei stele gigante. Ajungând în apropierea stelei, aceştia observă că în jurul ei gravitează patru planete, dintre care una seamănă foarte mult cu Pământul. Se hotărăsc să studieze această planetă şi ajung la un lac lângă care găsesc urme de paşi umani. Paşii aparţineau unei tinere femei ce nu purta haine şi nici nu se ruşina de acest lucru. Tânăra, ce va fi botezată Nova, nu ştie să vorbească, nici să zâmbească măcar, iar gesturile ei sunt asemănătoare cu ale animalelor. Conduşi în tabăra acesteia, exploratorii descoperă că şi ceilalţi oameni de planetă aveau un comportament primitiv.

Partea a II-a

Extended content

Jinn şi Phyllis, un cuplu de călători în spaţiu, găsesc un manuscris închis într-o sticlă şi află că în anul 2500 profesorul Antelle a organizat o expediţie pentru explorarea unei stele gigante. Ajungând în apropierea stelei, aceştia observă că în jurul ei gravitează patru planete, dintre care una seamănă foarte mult cu Pământul. Se hotărăsc să studieze această planetă şi ajung la un lac lângă care găsesc urme de paşi umani. Paşii aparţineau unei tinere femei ce nu purta haine şi nici nu se ruşina de acest lucru. Tânăra, ce va fi botezată Nova, nu ştie să vorbească, nici să zâmbească măcar, iar gesturile ei sunt asemănătoare cu ale animalelor. Conduşi în tabăra acesteia, exploratorii descoperă că şi ceilalţi oameni de planetă aveau un comportament primitiv.

Partea a III-a

Extended content

Jinn şi Phyllis, un cuplu de călători în spaţiu, găsesc un manuscris închis într-o sticlă şi află că în anul 2500 profesorul Antelle a organizat o expediţie pentru explorarea unei stele gigante. Ajungând în apropierea stelei, aceştia observă că în jurul ei gravitează patru planete, dintre care una seamănă foarte mult cu Pământul. Se hotărăsc să studieze această planetă şi ajung la un lac lângă care găsesc urme de paşi umani. Paşii aparţineau unei tinere femei ce nu purta haine şi nici nu se ruşina de acest lucru. Tânăra, ce va fi botezată Nova, nu ştie să vorbească, nici să zâmbească măcar, iar gesturile ei sunt asemănătoare cu ale animalelor. Conduşi în tabăra acesteia, exploratorii descoperă că şi ceilalţi oameni de planetă aveau un comportament primitiv.

Question

Does this { { help me } } really work? Căluşaru' (talk) 23:17, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Yes it does really work. Please do not misuse it. It alerts users in the IRC. If you misuse this it causes users to respond to a false alert. Thank you. Joe Gazz84^user•_talk•^contribs•_{Editor Review} 23:12, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

OK, thanks, I had no idea how it works. Still, there should be a gentle help me, one that doesn't alert people and simply answers their questions in a couple of hours, in a few days. Căluşaru' (talk) 23:17, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

(edit conflict) And users don't like false alerts ... makes us angry ... and trust me, you don't want to see an angry Wikipedian... :) Have a cookie!

--Imagine Wizard (talk • contribs • count) Iway amway Imagineway Izardway.

Not sure what you mean by a gentle help me ... --Imagine Wizard (talk • contribs • count) Iway amway Imagineway Izardway. 23:20, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

There is not one, in general if you have a question you can just ask an admin or a user for help. The {{helpme}} is for immediate or quick answers. Please do not misuse it. Thank you. Joe Gazz84^user•_talk•^contribs•_{Editor Review} 23:24, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Well, I see now I didn't say a word: sorry! I didn't know that helpme was intended for quick answers (although I imagined it was intended for serious questions). Anyway, I won't abuse it, I mainly read articles and rarely contribute. Well, thanks again, guys, and I'm sorry for having troubled you. Good cookies, by the way. See ya! Căluşaru' (talk)

No hard feelings! It is for serious questions but we all have fun feel free to join us at Wikipedia's Help channel, #wikipedia-en-help . Joe Gazz84^user•_talk•^contribs•_{Editor Review} 23:47, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Maria Răducanu

The article Maria Răducanu has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mhiji 22:34, 4 January 2011 (UTC)

Tables

Alphabetic	Numeric	Date	Unsortable
d	20	2008-11-24	This
b	8	2004-03-01	column
a	6	1979-07-23	can
c	4	1492-12-08	be
e	0	1601-08-13	sorted.

An example table

First header	Second header
upper left		right side
lower left	lower middle
A table in a table Two Wikipedia logos

WikiProject Romania

Hi! From your edits, it looks like you might be interested in contributing to WikiProject Romania. It is a project aimed at organizing and improving the quality and accuracy of articles related to Romania. Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 21:27, 21 January 2012 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Andrei Rostotsky

The article Andrei Rostotsky has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. AllyD (talk) 09:05, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

• It isn't about a living person. The actor died in 2002. Is it proposed for deletion because the article is just a stub? Căluşaru' (talk) 15:26, 4 June 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 30

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Museum of cacao and chocolate, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Dutch and French (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:40, 30 April 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Călin Gruia for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Călin Gruia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Călin Gruia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Nominated by Biruitorul.

• User:Mycomp, as a major contributor you are also invited to contribute this discussion. 94.102.49.88 (talk) 14:18, 25 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Calusarul. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Calusarul. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)