User talk:Buffbills7701/Archive 6
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
| Archive 1 | ← | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | Archive 7 | Archive 8 | → | Archive 10 |
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation, and please do get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly, your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. Regards from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 01:17, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
Russell Spanner
Hello. I recently submitted my first entry to Wikipedia. Looks like you rejected it on February 4. I would greatly appreciate any feedback so that I can make improvements and better understand the process for creating accurate submissions. The entry was for "Russell Spanner". J1544k (talk) 21:22, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
- @J1544k: Please see Wikipedia:References and Wikipedia:BIO for more information. buffbills7701 21:43, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 7, 2014)
 This staircase is an impossible object
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Life sciences • Low Countries Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Evad37 (talk) 01:33, 10 February 2014 (UTC) • |
|---|
Disambiguation link notification for February 10
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Proverb, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ignorance is bliss (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
Re: Pokémon Channel
Thanks for the review; I was afraid no one would get to it for months. For each of your concerns, I've either fixed the text accordingly or explain why I don't think it needs to be. Tezero (talk) 00:55, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
Some baklava for you!
|
I am fresh out of wiki kittens; please accept this cake as a thank you for your support during my (now withdrawn) RfA. What doesn't kill me... Cheers, Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 11:23, 12 February 2014 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 12 February 2014
- Technology report: Left with no choice
- Featured content: Space selfie
- Traffic report: Sports Day
- WikiProject report: Game Time in Russia
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:59, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 8, 2014)
 Model of a German SAR-Lupe reconnaissance satellite inside a Cosmos-3M rocket
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Impossible object • Life sciences Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Evad37 (talk) 16:22, 17 February 2014 (UTC) • |
|---|
VisualEditor Newsletter—February 2014
You can easily re-use references by going to the Insert menu, choosing "Reference", and clicking on "Use an existing reference" in the lower left corner. A list of all references, their numbers, and their ref names (if any) will be shown. You can search the list for any author, title, date, or other keyword. Read the user guide for more information.
Since the last newsletter, the VisualEditor team has worked on some small changes to the user interface, such as moving the reference item to the top of the Insert menu, as well as some minor features and fixing bugs, especially for rich copying and pasting of references.
The biggest change was the addition of more features to the image dialog, including the ability to set alignment (left, right, center), framing options (thumbnail, frame, frameless, and none), adding alt text, and defining the size manually. There is still some work to be done here, including a quick way to set the default size.
- The main priority is redesigning the reference dialog, with the goal of providing autofill features for ISBNs and URLs and streamlining the process. Current concept drawings are available at mw:VisualEditor/Design/Reference Dialog. Please share your ideas about making referencing quick and easy with the designers.
- A few bugs in the existing reference dialog were fixed. The toolbar was simplified to remove galleries and lists from the reference dialog. When you re-use references, it now correctly displays the references again, rather than just the number and name. If you paste content into a dialog that can't fit there (e.g.
==section headings==in references), it now strips out the inappropriate HTML. - You can now edit image galleries inside VisualEditor. At this time, the gallery tool is a very limited option that gives you access to the wikitext. It will see significant improvements at a later date.
- The character inserter tool in the "Insert" menu is being redesigned. Your feedback on the special character inserter is still wanted, especially if you depend on Wikipedia's character inserters for your normal editing rather than using the ones built into your computer.
- You can now see a help page about keyboard shortcuts in the page menu (three bars next to the Cancel button) (T54844).
- If you edit categories, your changes will now display correctly after saving the page (T50560).
- Saving the page should be faster now (T61660).
- Any community can ask to test a new tool to edit TemplateData by leaving a note at T53734.
Looking ahead: The link tool will tell you when you're linking to a disambiguation or redirect page. The warning about wikitext will hide itself after you remove the wikitext markup in that paragraph. Support for creating and editing redirects is in the pipeline. Looking further out, image handling will be improved, including default and upright sizes. The developers are also working on support for viewing and editing hidden HTML comments, some behavioral magic words like DISPLAYTITLE, and in-line language setting (dir="rtl").
If you have questions or suggestions for future improvements, or if you encounter problems, please let everyone know by posting a note at Wikipedia:VisualEditor/Feedback. Thank you! Whatamidoing (WMF) 04:20, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
The Signpost: 19 February 2014
- News and notes: Foundation takes aim at undisclosed paid editing; Greek Wikipedia editor faces down legal challenge
- Technology report: ULS Comeback
- WikiProject report: Countering Systemic Bias
- Featured content: Holotype
- Traffic report: Chilly Valentines
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:10, 21 February 2014 (UTC)
Villanelle
Hi Buffbills7701, just letting you know that I've responded to all of the points you raise in your GA review. Thanks, MasterOfHisOwnDomain (talk) 19:28, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 9, 2014)
 An example of the human skeleton
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Reconnaissance satellite • Impossible object Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 00:41, 25 February 2014 (UTC) • |
|---|
A brownie for you!
|
A brownie to you for reviewing at least 15 submissions during the WikiProject Articles for creation December 2013 - January 2014 Backlog Elimination Drive. Thanks for contributing to the backlog elimination drive! Posted by Northamerica1000 (talk) on 10:25, 26 February 2014 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation |
Hello Buffbills7701:
WikiProject AFC is holding a month long Backlog Elimination Drive!
The goal of this drive is to eliminate the backlog of unreviewed articles. The drive is running from March 1, 2014 to March 31, 2014.
Awards will be given out for all reviewers participating in the drive in the form of barnstars at the end of the drive.
There is a backlog of over 2600 articles, so start reviewing articles! Visit the drive's page and help out!
Posted by Northamerica1000 (talk) on 02:12, 28 February 2014 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk), on behalf of WikiProject Articles for creation
The Signpost: 26 February 2014
- Featured content: Odin salutes you
- WikiProject report: Racking brains with neuroscience
- Special report: Diary of a protester: Wikimedian perishes in Ukrainian unrest
- Traffic report: Snow big deal
- Recent research: CSCW '14 retrospective; the impact of SOPA on deletionism
- Read this Signpost in full
- Single-page
- Unsubscribe
- MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:26, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
WikiCup 2014 February newsletter
And so ends the most competitive first round we have ever seen, with 38 points required to qualify for round 2. Last year, 19 points secured a place; before that, 11 (2012) or 8 (2011) were enough. This is both a blessing and a curse. While it shows the vigourous good health of the competition, it also means that we have already lost many worthy competitors. Our top three scorers were:
Godot13 (submissions), a WikiCup newcomer whose high-quality scans of rare banknotes represent an unusual, interesting and valuable contribution to Wikipedia. Most of Godot's points this round have come from a large set of pictures used in Treasury Note (1890–91).
Adam Cuerden (submissions), a WikiCup veteran and a finalist last year, Adam is also a featured picture specialist, focusing on the restoration of historical images. This month's promotions have included a carefully restored set of artist William Russell Flint's work.
WikiRedactor (submissions), another WikiCup newcomer. WikiRedactor has claimed points for good article reviews and good articles relating to pop music, many of which were awarded bonus points. Articles include Sky Ferreira, Hannah Montana 2: Meet Miley Cyrus and "Wrecking Ball" (Miley Cyrus song).
Other competitors of note include:
Hahc21 (submissions), who helped take Thirty Flights of Loving through good article candidates and featured article candidates, claiming the first first featured article of the competition.
Prism (submissions), who claimed the first featured list of the competition with Natalia Kills discography.
Cwmhiraeth (submissions), who takes the title of the contributor awarded the highest bonus point multiplier (resulting in the highest scoring article) of the competition so far. Her high-importance salamander, now a good article, scored 108 points.
After such a competitive first round, expect the second round to also be fiercely fought. Remember that any content promoted after the end of round 1 but before the start of round 2 can be claimed in round 2, but please do not update your submission page until March (UTC). Invitations for collaborative writing efforts or any other discussion of potentially interesting work is always welcome on the WikiCup talk page. Remember, if two or more WikiCup competitors have done significant work on an article, all can claim points equally.
If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. If you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to help keep down the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email), The ed17 (talk • email) and Miyagawa (talk • email) 00:01, 1 March 2014 (UTC)
This week's article for improvement (week 10, 2014)
 Because it is so vast, there are a large number of different cultures involved in Prehistoric Asia
The following is WikiProject Today's articles for improvement's weekly selection: Previous selections: Human skeleton • Reconnaissance satellite Get involved with the TAFI project! You can... Posted by: MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of EuroCarGT (talk) 03:48, 3 March 2014 (UTC) • |
|---|
Upcoming signpost wikiproject interview
I just realized that you have completed an interview with wp:ARS, which is one of the most important wikiprojects on Wikipedia in my humble opinion. Is it too late to add questions to this interview to liven it up a bit? For example:
- What type of articles are more likely to be nominated for deletion?
- Have you ever noticed articles nominated for deletion as a form of censorhip?
- Where can interested editors find statistics about the number of articles nominated for deletion/% deleted/% kept etc over the years?
- Does the project collaborate with other related projects, such as wp:editor retention?
- Why was this project itself a candidate for deletion?
- Have you ever considered expanding to save other wiki-content such as templates, categories, etc? XOttawahitech (talk)
- Sorry, but it's too late to add questions. Thank you, however, as those questions are really good. buffbills7701 02:07, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Just wondering if user:Mabeenot and user:The ed17 also think it is too late? Thanks, XOttawahitech (talk) 15:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- I'd leave it up to the writer of the report to determine whether it's too late to add more. Ultimately, it's a question of whether you can get the respondents to return and answer more questions with such a short notice (and whether they're willing to do it). The other option is pushing this report back a week and running next week's report in it's place. –Mabeenot (talk) 16:52, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was thinking about holding it back a week, but then I remembered about getting the answerers back. It honestly just would take too much unnecessary work. buffbills7701 22:15, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- You two are the ones writing it, so I'll leave the decision to you. While adding insightful questions adds interest, I'm not the one who has to do the work to transcribe it all. :-) Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 15:24, 4 March 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, I was thinking about holding it back a week, but then I remembered about getting the answerers back. It honestly just would take too much unnecessary work. buffbills7701 22:15, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- I'd leave it up to the writer of the report to determine whether it's too late to add more. Ultimately, it's a question of whether you can get the respondents to return and answer more questions with such a short notice (and whether they're willing to do it). The other option is pushing this report back a week and running next week's report in it's place. –Mabeenot (talk) 16:52, 2 March 2014 (UTC)
- Just wondering if user:Mabeenot and user:The ed17 also think it is too late? Thanks, XOttawahitech (talk) 15:33, 2 March 2014 (UTC)