August 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:49, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply


  Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jahaz Haveli, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Schazjmd (talk) 18:12, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Siting source is already linked in the wiki page, see the link https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pandit_Todarmal on page https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jahaz_Haveli, i have also added the same in comment. Stop pointing out blindly. Bsbhansali (talk) 18:16, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
The lede sentence of the article mentions "Jain scholar." There are existing sources saying he was from an Agarwal family. Furthermore, continuing to leave incivil comments like this will result in a block. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:17, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Nothing about comment was incivil. refer https://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Diwan_Todar_Mal, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pandit_Todarmal and https://sikhizm.com/diwan-todar-mal-ji-history/ redo my change. Bsbhansali (talk) 18:21, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
No. If you change it again, you will be blocked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:22, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Can't you see proper references? Bsbhansali (talk) 18:23, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Can you not understand that an individual can be a Jain scholar and from the Agarwal community at the same time? OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:24, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
JAIN AND AGRAWAL ARE COMPLETELY DIFFERENT COMMUNITIES. you need you get your knowledge ironed our properly before commenting and refer proper references.
Here is one more reference from Siki Wiki https://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Diwan_Todar_Mal Bsbhansali (talk) 18:28, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Please refer the reference instead of just commenting for the sake of it. Bsbhansali (talk) 18:29, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
https://www.tribuneindia.com/2004/20040102/punjab1.htm#11 Bsbhansali (talk) 18:30, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Looking more closely at the references, Jahaz Haveli was linking to the wrong individual; it should be linked to the Todar Mal article, which I've done. See [1]. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:32, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
LOOK AT THE REFERENCES I HAVE GIVEN BEOFRE "MUTILATING" the page.
https://www.tribuneindia.com/2004/20040102/punjab1.htm#11
https://www.sikhiwiki.org/index.php/Diwan_Todar_Mal Bsbhansali (talk) 18:34, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Please calm down; there seem to be conflicting sources. Please take the discussion to Talk:Jahaz Haveli. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:36, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
You need to first undo your edit which you took liberty of doing without any evidence. i am calm, i just can't tolerate people who simply replies for the sake of it without reading the reference provided. example yourself. Bsbhansali (talk) 18:39, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
If there is a source in the other Wikipedia article that would support the change that you want to make to Jahaz Haveli, you can include it in the article with your edit (not in the edit summary). Or if any of the other URLs that you are posting here would be better references, include those. You may find User:Nick Moyes/Easier Referencing for Beginners helpful for learning how to format a reference. Schazjmd (talk) 18:42, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Per WP:RS, https://www.sikhiwiki.org/ is not a reliable source. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:42, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
This very page was evidence which you Mutilated without any evidence? Bsbhansali (talk) 18:46, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
I've started a discussion on the talk page here. Please take your concerns there. OhNoitsJamie Talk 18:46, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Final warning for posting poorly sourced content

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:11, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

August 2022

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 02:12, 29 August 2022 (UTC)Reply