Brijvasi200

May 2023

Hello, I'm Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rabb Se Hai Dua have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Idontknowwhattouseasmyusername300 (talk) 13:29, 1 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:38, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

March 2024

Hello, I'm CNMall41. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Rabb Se Hai Dua, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. You added back credits without a source that were removed per WP:TVCAST. There is also no need for the subheadings. If you feel they should be included, feel free to discuss per WP:ONUS. CNMall41 (talk) 09:06, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm CNMall41. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rabb Se Hai Dua have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. FINAL WARNING - In addition to adding unsourced content and not adhering to WP:ONUS, you are now edit warring. CNMall41 (talk) 22:38, 4 March 2024 (UTC)

Hello, I'm CNMall41. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Despite warnings on this and being told about WP:ONUS, you refuse to discuss and would rather edit war. CNMall41 (talk) 20:50, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Rabb Se Hai Dua. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. CNMall41 (talk) 17:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Edit war

Final warning on Rabb Se Hai Dua. You obviously do not seem willing to work in a collaborative environment so next will be reported to WP:ANI. CNMall41 (talk) 20:52, 6 March 2024 (UTC)

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. CNMall41 (talk) 17:56, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for unresponsive editing / disruptively ignoring concerns voiced here on this page.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 19:27, 13 March 2024 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Brijvasi200 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Dear wikipedia, my recent contributions to Rabb Se Hai Dua was reliable. I was just adding the leap of 22 years, 8 months, etc. I had no intention to start an edit war and I promise to be soft and collaborative now onwards. I didn't add any useless content, you may check the pages of Kundali Bhagya, Kumkum Bhagya, etc, they have even shown the leaps that their shows have take. It's not my fault and I have been blocked from editing. Please, I hope you consider this request and take the right decision.

Decline reason:

User shows no understanding of how to achieve WP:CONSENSUS and plans to immediately resume their edit war (see below). Yamla (talk) 14:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Brijvasi200, you were instructed that you need to gain WP:CONSENSUS for your changes. This means that you need to utilize the talk page of that article and discuss why you feel the informaiton should be included. You are blocked as you decided to edit war instead of going through that process. I would have no objection to an unblock if an admin sees fit, but note that the edit warring is not acceptable. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:17, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

I know that edit warring is not acceptable. I would like to work with you in a very collaborative way. Brijvasi200 (talk) 04:34, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

That would be up to the administrator reviewing your unblock request. --CNMall41 (talk) 04:50, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Meh. Not feeling it inside. I'll pass. -- Deepfriedokra (talk) 05:15, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Brijvasi200, if unblocked, what would you do differently? How specifically would you decide whether or not to add the leap back to the article? Please be very clear in your answer. Although I'm asking about this specific case, I'm trying to determine if you clearly understand the general rule you need to follow to resolve future disputes. --Yamla (talk) 11:39, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Mentioning "22 year later" is very important as it will help the readers understand the show more correctly. I will try to explain what changes did I make and why if I am unblocked. Brijvasi200 (talk) 14:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

In that case, I'm afraid I have to decline your unblock request. --Yamla (talk) 14:07, 14 March 2024 (UTC)