August 2022

edit

  Hi Brennen10! I noticed that you recently marked an edit as minor at Edinburgh International Film Festival that may not have been. "Minor edit" has a very specific definition on Wikipedia—it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Please see Help:Minor edit for more information. Thank you. PopoDameron (talk) 20:02, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Copy, thank you Brennen10 (talk) 20:03, 31 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vidiots Foundation (September 2)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jamiebuba was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Jamiebuba (talk) 22:05, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Brennen10! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jamiebuba (talk) 22:05, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vidiots Foundation (September 3)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Greenman (talk) 09:03, 3 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vidiots Foundation (September 6)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by CNMall41 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
CNMall41 (talk) 18:32, 6 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Vidiots (store) has been accepted

edit
 
Vidiots (store), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 19:52, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Hi Brennen10, given most of the in-depth coverage was about the store rather than the foundation, I updated it to focus on the store (title, content, etc.), along with other cleanup to remove poor sources when better ones existed (WP:CITEBOMB), some content that leaned promotional or WP:UNDUE, etc. Given you have a WP:COI, you should not edit the article directly but rather make edit requests (or anyone else affiliated with Vidiots). Also this was a "borderline" acceptance so keep an eye out because it could either be moved back to a draft or nominated for deletion. If you have questions or need help, you (or anyone) can ask at the Teahouse. S0091 (talk) 20:22, 5 December 2022 (UTC)Reply