Bluespidey2k
| This is Bluespidey2k's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments. |
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Dooniwari has been accepted edit
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thanks again, and happy editing!
CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:34, 17 February 2021 (UTC)Welcome! edit
Hello, Bluespidey2k, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- How to write a great article
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Your first article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
- Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
- and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! CommanderWaterford (talk) 11:34, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
Bluespidey2k, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit
|
Hi Bluespidey2k! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 18 February 2021 (UTC) |
The article Syed Shamas ud Din Gamgeen Andrabi has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No reliable independent sources to establish notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kichuđ Need any help? 06:41, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
The article Ruhez Amrelia has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
As is often the case with YouTubers, does not meet WP:GNG. The clearly-marked advertorial in Financial Express is not enough and I found nothing better in a WP:BEFORE search.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:12, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Syed Shamas ud Din Gamgeen Andrabi for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Syed Shamas ud Din Gamgeen Andrabi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Kichuđ Need any help? 07:29, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Ruhez Amrelia for deletion edit
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ruhez Amrelia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 07:57, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
April 2021 edit
Hello Bluespidey2k. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Ruhez Amrelia, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Bluespidey2k. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose â e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Bluespidey2k|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken â you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits â please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 13:07, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
No, I never promote any topic for someone. I do it because it makes me happy to contribute for Wikipedia. I have already created several articles. It just hurts when you spent time in creating an Wikipedia article and it gets deleted without any reason. It really hurts much. If this page gets removed, then i'll never contribute anything to Wikipedia. Bluespidey2k (talk) 23:51, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
September 2022 edit
Hello. Your recent edit appears to have added the name of a non-notable entity to a list that normally includes only notable entries. In general, a person, organization or product added to a list should have a pre-existing article before being added to most lists. If you wish to create such an article, please first confirm that the subject qualifies for a separate, stand-alone article according to Wikipedia's notability guideline. Thank you. MrOllie (talk) 10:40, 3 September 2022 (UTC)