Welcome!

edit

Hello, Blingblingboy1, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Evan Schwartz (YouTuber), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Norvoid (talk) 03:29, 6 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Evan Schwartz (YouTuber)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Evan Schwartz (YouTuber) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Norvoid (talk) 03:29, 6 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mighty Swag (January 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:01, 5 January 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Blingblingboy1, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 14:01, 5 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

January 2016

edit
 

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Valenciano (talk) 21:18, 8 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mighty Swag (January 24)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Wiae was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
/wiae /tlk 14:16, 24 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: MightySwag (January 25)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
SwisterTwister talk 07:44, 25 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

January 2016

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Marguerite DeFlorin, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. KylieTastic (talk) 14:38, 28 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Suicide of Amanda Todd, you may be blocked from editing. EvergreenFir (talk) Please {{re}} 17:31, 28 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roxanne DeFlorin (January 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 22:20, 28 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Roxanne DeFlorin (January 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 13:11, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: MightySwag (January 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 19:42, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

January 2016

edit

  Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Draft: Mighty Swag, did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Continuing to resubmit the same draft after it is repeatedly declined, without asking for advice, is tendentious. Robert McClenon (talk) 19:44, 29 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sanne Vloet (February 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 14:05, 7 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: MightySwag (February 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by JQTriple7 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

February 2016

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to remove Miscellany for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did at Draft:Evan T. Schwartz, you may be blocked from editing. Removing MFD template. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Evan T. Schwartz. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Do not remove AFC comments from drafts. Robert McClenon (talk) 20:53, 9 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did with this edit to Evan Schwartz. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:20, 9 February 2016 (UTC)Reply


Speedy deletion of "Evan Schwartz (YouTuber)"

edit
 

Evan Schwartz (YouTuber), a page you created, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how they are important or significant, and thus why they should be included in an encyclopedia. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and the guidelines for biographies in particular..

You are welcome to contribute content that complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Ueutyi (talk) 22:28, 9 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

ANI Notice

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Robert McClenon (talk) 01:24, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

February 2016

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

-- Ricky81682 (talk) 04:39, 10 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Draft:Roxanne DeFlorin

edit

  Draft:Roxanne DeFlorin, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Roxanne DeFlorin and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Roxanne DeFlorin during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Safiel (talk) 22:01, 17 February 2016 (UTC)Reply