Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, BlankNarcissus. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Clifford H. Singer, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Fancy Refrigerator (talk) 08:12, 10 June 2023 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Clifford Singer for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Clifford Singer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Clifford Singer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Netherzone (talk) 21:33, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion declined: Clifford Singer

edit

Hello BlankNarcissus. I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of Clifford Singer, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Looking at the WP:G7 speedy deletion criterion, this requires both #1 a good faith request and #2 a lack of substantial contribution to the article by anyone else but you. In my opinion, the substantive contributions by other editors would appear to negate #1. Thank you. Shirt58 (talk) 🦘 10:41, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Previous accounts

edit

Hello BlankNarcissus, have you had any previous accounts on Wikipedia? Netherzone (talk) 17:09, 4 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Blocked as a sockpuppet

edit
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively as a sockpuppet of User:Daniel Martin77 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Daniel Martin77. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Spicy (talk) 01:18, 27 May 2024 (UTC)Reply