Welcome!

edit

Hello, Besternkhan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was Wikipedia:Requests for page protection, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 12:33, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Syed Aman Miya Sharma

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Syed Aman Miya Sharma requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Syed_Aman_Mian_Sharma&oldid=752466753. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

This was a copy and paste move, and did not preserve the attribution, so is a WP:copyright violation. Please read WP:Copying within Wikipedia - David Biddulph (talk) 12:54, 1 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Besternkhan, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Besternkhan! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Soni (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 1 December 2016 (UTC)

Editing other editor's comments

edit

Hi Besternkhan. Please do not edit other editor's comments like you did with this edit to Draft:Syed Aman Mian Sharma. AfC reviewer comments are intended to help you understand issues related to the draft, so if you would like clarification of what SwisterTwister posted, then ask for assistance on Draft talk:Syed Aman Mian Sharma or User talk:SwisterTwister. Rewording another editor's comment like you did is not acceptable per Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines#Others' comments under any circumstances so please take care to avoid doing so in the future. -- Marchjuly (talk) 07:59, 6 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. - You've done it again in this edit. despite previous warnings. Even more deceptively, you left SwisterTwister's signature at the end of your new words; this is totally unacceptable. --David Biddulph (talk) 21:13, 6 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Final warning

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Draft:Syed Aman Mian Sharma. - You have been told repeatedly not to remove previous review feedback and comments from the draft. You may add additional comments in an {{AFC comment}} template, or on the draft talk page, but you must not remove the fedback and comments which are already there. Any further reviewer will consider to what extent the previous feedback and comments have been addressed, and if they deem the draft fit for publication as an article they will remove all the feedback and comments from the draft. If you persist in removing the feedback and comments this is liable to be treated as disruptive editing and lead to you being blocked from editing. --David Biddulph (talk) 19:20, 8 December 2016 (UTC)Reply