Beamer103

Welcome to my talk page! Send me messages above the first text box! :) NOTE: Tide Rolls helped me put it on! Thanks to user:tide rolls For helping me put on the message sending textbox!

Talkpage

Messages/Warnings/Responds/etc.

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page Precautionary statement has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tiderolls 23:35, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Precautionary statement. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tiderolls 23:36, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Careful

Don't refactor the talk page comments of other editors. Thanks Tiderolls 23:47, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:48, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Your question

No, there are no "friend requests" on Wikipedia. Everyone is your friend, at least you should treat everyone as a friend. You should really visit the main page and find some tasks that interest you and start helping out. We need the help. Thanks Tiderolls 00:02, 5 May 2010 (UTC)

ICarly (Second Page)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of ICarly (Second Page), and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: ICarly. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:28, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Your contributed article, ICarly (Second Page)

Hello, I notice that you recently created a new page, ICarly (Second Page). First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as yourself. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page - iCarly. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will to continue helping improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at iCarly - you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think that the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. ALI ^{nom nom} 02:29, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Zombie Panic! Source 2: The Zombie Strikeback

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Zombie Panic! Source 2: The Zombie Strikeback, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ALI ^{nom nom} 02:30, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Zombie Panic! Source 2: The Zombie Strikeback

I have nominated Zombie Panic! Source 2: The Zombie Strikeback, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Zombie Panic! Source 2: The Zombie Strikeback. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. ALI ^{nom nom} 20:34, 7 May 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit that you made to the page User talk:A little insignificant has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Please use the sandbox for testing any edits; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing for further information. Thank you. Tommy2010 16:28, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Zombie Panic! Source 2: The Zombie Strikeback. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. Tommy2010 16:29, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Re:

I'm not sure, but it seems you were being warned for removing an AFD notice from Zombie Panic! Source 2: The Zombie Strikeback. I would suggest that you self revert and replace the notice immediately. If you don't do this you may be blocked. Also, this edit is very concerning. Four days ago I warned you that this was not done. Your actions make it appear that you don't care about Wikipedia policies. You need to apologize to User:A little insignificant on their talk page. I would futher advise that, for the short term at least, you ask someone about your future edits before you execute them. You are exhibiting a dangerous lack of knowledge regarding Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. This could be entirely unintentional, but the block that could result would not be. Please be more careful. Regards Tiderolls 19:25, 9 May 2010 (UTC) Copied from my reply on my talk page.

I issued a final warning when it became apparent that the article you created was a hoax, and after investigating some of your other edits, I formed the distinct impression that you were a bad-faith account. I came home today to find my talk page had been the subject of much excitement on your behalf. Normally in these circumstances I would request a block on the spot, but perhaps we can do things differently for once. Tiderolls has gone out of his way to be kinder and more forgiving of you than we are of most users. I would appreciate an apology for vandalizing my talk page, and perhaps an apology to Tiderolls for betraying his trust. If you feel up to that, we could start over. I could see you becoming a prolific user here. ALI ^{nom nom} 21:15, 9 May 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of ICarly: The Movie

The article ICarly: The Movie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence that such a movie exists or is in development.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ... discospinster _talk 04:04, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Unreferenced information

Please do not add unreferenced (and likely false) information into Wikipedia articles. This behaviour could lead to your account being blocked. ... discospinster _talk 04:10, 11 May 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 20:14, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

	Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
	Q1: A1:

Hey

I didn't realize you had apologized- when you didn't respond for two days, I didn't think you would come back at all. I'm impressed, and I accept your apology. If you ever need any help with anything here, feel free to ask me.

Oh! And I notice you've been trying out a template on your talk page. Did you know that you can have extra pages in userspace? For example, I have a personal sandbox here that I use for trying out templates and messing around. You could create something like User:Beamer103/sandbox for messing around in. Anyway, just some advice. Have a great time. ALI ^{nom nom} 14:15, 14 May 2010 (UTC)

??? ALI ^{nom nom} 14:06, 15 May 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 911 Dispatcing (anime)

A tag has been placed on 911 Dispatcing (anime) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 05:10, 20 May 2010 (UTC)

New problems

You need to stop your editing experiments. This editor is not blocked. On the same editor's talk page you posted a warning that included another editor's signature. While most likely unintentional, this action looks very deceptive. I see you have also contacted a blocked user appearing to explain their block to them. This was unnecessary as the blocking administrator posted a block notice that explained the situation adequately. Please understand this. This is the last time I will come here to warn you. I will not block you myself, but if you do not redirect your editing energies toward more constructive purposes I will bring your actions to the attention of the wider community for review. Tiderolls 05:28, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Userbox

You seem to have a Userbox on your userpage saying that you are an administrator. I think that you should probably remove it, as it is not true, and may mislead some users. Hi878 (talk) 01:45, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

The warning on my talk page...

Hi, Beamer103!

You recently came by and left this note on my talk page. First, I don't believe I've ever edited the page in question - Roblox2, I think. Second, you might want to take a look at WP:UW and some of the guidelines about User Warnings. A "Stop or you'll be blocked" is generally reserved for a persistent vandal - probably shouldn't be used on the very first warning on my talk page. Thanks for your enthusiasm :) -- SatyrTN (talk / contribs) 22:29, 25 May 2010 (UTC)

June 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Hamtaro are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 11:14, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

2006 in television

Hi, Beamer! I pretty much stopped editing those pages a couple years ago, mostly because there are other subjects which interested me more. I would, however, like to note that there exists a whole series on television in Japan, including 2006 in Japanese television. You might want to consider adding your entries there instead. Cheers,—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); June 2, 2010; 13:50 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 911 Dispatching

A tag has been placed on 911 Dispatching requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Empty Buffer (talk) 23:43, 24 June 2010 (UTC)

Re: Usefy Page Request

No, since after you sent my message, you went and re-created the page, which is very poor form. Also, the page was already userfied at User:Beamer103/911 Dispatching over a month ago; I've just deleted that copy since there is absolutely no hope of this series gaining a Wikipedia article at this time. See the notability guideline for websites; it requires that any web content added to Wikipedia must have several articles about it in major publications like The New York Times or major web blogs. Graham87 02:52, 26 June 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 911 Dispatching

A tag has been placed on 911 Dispatching, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing no content to the reader. Please note that external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article don't count as content. Moreover, please add more verifiable sources, not only 3rd party sources. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material. To do this, affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and state your intention on the article's talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. The Blade of the Northern Lights (talk) 19:27, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

July 2010

Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with 911 Dispatching. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion, and make your case on the page's talk page. Thank you. Favonian (talk) 19:30, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Roblox, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 19:34, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User:Graham87, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 19:38, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am glad to see you are interested in discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Hamtaro are for discussion related to improving the article, not general discussion about the topic. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. —Farix (t | c) 19:44, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User:Graham87, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. HarryZilber (talk) 22:24, 12 July 2010 (UTC)

Thornbury Hoard

Can you please tell me what you are trying to do at this article? So far, you've added a completely inappropriate CSD tag on it, a AfD notice, a personal attack warning (and to the talk page). What is it you are trying to do? Besides, it doesn't meet any CSD criteria as it now states its claim to notability and is referenced as such. – B.hotep •talk• 20:17, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Ah, if I didn't know better, I would assume it has something to do with this (the last administrator to delete your article). Please don't take it personally. And... I didn't create the above article.

I've moved List of 911 Dispatching episodes to your user space for you to work on. It may be moved back into article space when you have completed it (Wikipedia articles do not as a rule have "page not completed on them"). However, if it does not meet Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, it may be subjected to any of the various deletion methods available. – B.hotep •talk• 20:44, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Nintendo GameCube, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Alphathon^TM (talk) 20:51, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Roblox, you may be blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 20:56, 15 July 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of T.U.F.F. Puppy

The article T.U.F.F. Puppy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Too speculative at this point. Should be re-created if and when real details emerge.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Pichpich (talk) 22:46, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

Non-free files in your user space

Hey there Beamer103, thank you for your contributions. I am a bot, alerting you that non-free files are not allowed in user or talk space. I removed some files I found on User:Beamer103/sandbox. In the future, please refrain from adding fair-use files to your user-space drafts or your talk page.

• See a log of files removed today here.

• Shut off the bot here.

• Report errors here.

Thank you, -- DASHBot (talk) 05:07, 4 August 2010 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:03, 7 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of List of T.U.F.F. Puppy Episodes

Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your test worked, and the page that you created has been or soon will be deleted. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:30, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

August 2010

Please do not template the regulars, as you did here. User:ESkog is an admin and he was not removing the CSD tag from Madden NFL 11. Furthermore, your re-addition of the CSD tag after an IP removed it is against policy. Any user except for the creator of the page may remove (or decline) the speedy deletion nomination. Eagles 24/7 (C) 02:38, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Please stop adding <ref>1</ref>, etc. to articles. That is not a reference. A reference is a source for the information in the article (like a website or book). Also, stop warning editors for no good reason. You warned User:Vor'Cha for creating an article that had no references, but he actually didn't create the article. Since he is still considered a new user, you violated Wikipedia's guideline against biting new users. Eagles 24/7 (C) 16:55, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of T.U.F.F. Puppy

The article T.U.F.F. Puppy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreleased production, unreferenced, non notable as of yet.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WuhWuzDat 16:38, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of T.U.F.F. Puppy

A tag has been placed on T.U.F.F. Puppy, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion debate, such as at articles for deletion. Under the specified criteria, where an article has substantially identical content to that of an article deleted after debate, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. WuhWuzDat 16:40, 12 August 2010 (UTC)

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits.
The next time you create an inappropriate page, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You have been asked numerous times not to recreate this article; you made it worse by removing the speedy deletion template. PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:56, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

• • One more thing: Hoaxes such as the "911 Dispatching" entries will get you blocked faster than anything else. Friendly bit of advice you'd do well to heed. PMDrive1061 (talk) 18:01, 14 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of 911 Dispatching (online anime)

A tag has been placed on 911 Dispatching (online anime) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:22, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Online Animation

A tag has been placed on Online Animation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eagles 24/7 (C) 23:24, 23 August 2010 (UTC)

Blocked for hoaxes, other inappropriate edits

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

--PMDrive1061 (talk) 00:47, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beamer103 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am so sorry for the vandalism. I got carried away for a while. Can you at least forgive me? I got carried away from creating pages. I swear by Wikipedia Policy that I will never do the following: Vandalism, Hoaxes, Disruptive Edits, etc. Ever again.I have re-read the rules for Wikipedia. And I swear not to do it again. I re-read all the rules for Wikipedia. I will stop breaking the rules on Wikipedai. Please forgive me. I didn't know 911 Dispatching and my other pages I have created would be deleted and didn't meet Wikipedia's Criterea.

Decline reason:

If you honestly didn't know those pages would be deleted when they had already been deleted multiple times before then you apparently lack the basic level of competence required to edit here. Beeblebrox (talk) 19:38, 24 August 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Beamer103 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am really sorry. Can you please unblock me? I never ment to do that.

Decline reason:

If you didn't mean to do this, that means that somehow you are unable to prevent yourself from making inappropriate edits. Clearly an unblock would be inappropriate for someone who makes inappropriate edits even when trying not to. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:15, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• I won't review this (pointless) unblock request since I've already declined you once, but if this is the best reasoning you can come up with I wouldn't feel the least bit compelled to unblock you. How could you have "not meant to do it?" That's just nonsense. Be aware that repeated use of the unblock template without supplying any real reason for unblocking you can lead to your ability to appeal the block in this manner being revoked. Beeblebrox (talk) 23:58, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Beamer103 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Eagles 24/7 (C) 17:50, 5 September 2010 (UTC)