I feel a little bit robbed of an opportunity to learn here. I reached out to you because I wanted to do this right and not end up causing a mess. I was actively spending time reading other sources to try and improve this article and you very much took the air out my sail when I logged on today to find out you just went ahead and copied everything over. I will still try to improve the new articles, but I just want to let you know its not very welcoming what you did there as someone who is clearly a veteran user. @Smokefoot

Balonlon (talk) 12:40, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Sorry to "rob" you. There is lots more to do. I was going to merge two similar articles on Alpine borane, also related to carbonyl reduction. You are welcome to do the blending. --Smokefoot (talk) 13:57, 29 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Archive

Extended content

Your submission at Articles for creation: SovietWomble (July 3) edit

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 18:07, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, Balonlon! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 18:07, 3 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: SovietWomble (July 11) edit

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Festucalex were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Festucalextalk 10:28, 11 July 2023 (UTC)Reply
Well since there are no other sources, I guess I will park the draft for now in hopes of better sources later on. Balonlon (talk) 12:44, 11 July 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:SovietWomble edit

  Hello, Balonlon. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:SovietWomble, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 11:06, 11 December 2023 (UTC)Reply