Sources

edit

Regarding your contributions to Mike Aguirre; I've added requests for citations on numerous passages in the article. The UT noticed the recent changes, and I agree with them (to an extent) that the current content of the articles is skating on the edge of neutral-point-of-view. I don't think the word "gadfly" is necessarily pejorative, but some of the other characterizations (like "profane") should be sourced or toned-down. Thanks, OhNoitsJamie Talk 23:40, 3 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 29 April

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:32, 30 April 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nancy Worden (May 22)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.


 
Hello! BWorks, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! JustBerry (talk) 06:48, 22 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, BWorks. You have new messages at JustBerry's talk page.
Message added 15:13, 24 May 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.Reply

JustBerry (talk) 15:13, 24 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Nancy Worden has been accepted

edit
 
Nancy Worden, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 07:30, 24 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Art Jewelry Forum

edit

Hello, I am working on a pet project to help digitize information about the field of metalsmithing+jewelry. I started with making a page for Art jewelry forum (AJF), and have a list of artists that I would like to make pages for as well. The AJF page has been nominated for deletion because it is questioned if the organization is "notable". I am reaching out to you because I saw that you edited some pages that relate to studio craft, and thought you may have an informed opinion (unlike the mathematician who nominated the page for deletion) about whether or not it is a "notable organization". If you have an opinion, one way or another, please way in on the articles for deletion discussion https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Art_jewelry_forumClarefinin (talk) 21:33, 11 July 2015 (UTC)Reply