BLING8293, you are invited to the Teahouse edit

 

Hi BLING8293! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Jtmorgan (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 8 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Censorship of Regular Show in the UK edit

 

The article Censorship of Regular Show in the UK has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is completely unreferenced original research and does not pass WP:GNG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. 130.88.141.34 (talk) 11:15, 9 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Censorship of Regular Show in the United Kingdom for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Censorship of Regular Show in the United Kingdom is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Censorship of Regular Show in the United Kingdom until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Delsion23 (talk) 00:19, 11 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Censorship of Regular Show in Canada for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Censorship of Regular Show in Canada is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Censorship of Regular Show in Canada until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 05:37, 11 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Censorship of The Amazing World of Gumball in the United States for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Censorship of The Amazing World of Gumball in the United States is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Censorship of The Amazing World of Gumball in the United States until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 09:16, 11 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Censorship of Adventure Time in Australia for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Censorship of Adventure Time in Australia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Censorship of Adventure Time in Australia until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 10:49, 11 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Category:The Amazing World of Gumball Censorship edit

Category:The Amazing World of Gumball Censorship, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. TheLongTone (talk) 14:28, 11 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Vehicle registration plates of Asia Pacific edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Vehicle registration plates of Asia Pacific, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Rwxrwxrwx (talk) 17:54, 21 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of MasterChef Turkey edit

 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as MasterChef Turkey, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. The page has been nominated for deletion, in accordance with Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Eduemoni↑talk↓ 02:28, 30 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Regarding your recent new creations on Wikipedia edit

Hello there, it seems that you are creating articles, that is awesome, however there are some criterias that must be followed for new article and one of them is notability and also its specific guideline criteria, for example songs are part of WP:MUSIC, a soccer player WP:SPORTS, when a subject has no independent guideline it falls under general criteria, and so far both articles you created doesn't seem to meet the criteria (I failed to find any notability on both tv series articles which you created), experiment your sandbox. Regards Eduemoni↑talk↓ 02:38, 30 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

At first I speedy nominated them, but I reverted it to redirects, try finding reliable sources which may sustain their notability and edit the article without removing the redirect tag, for visual aspect, transclude the article into WP:SANDBOX. Cheers Eduemoni↑talk↓ 02:40, 30 April 2013 (UTC)Reply