BBG On YT

BBG On YT, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi BBG On YT! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Worm That Turned (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:02, 6 April 2021 (UTC)

August 2021

Hello, I'm Rdp060707. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Diep.io—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. ----Rdp060707|talk 05:10, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

January 2024

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Black Lives Matter. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 20:09, 4 January 2024 (UTC)

Please explain to me how adding the name of the officer is adding my own point of view? It is adding more context and correct information to the already provided information. BBG On YT (talk) 18:15, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Black Lives Matter. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. BBG On YT (talk) 18:26, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

The fact that Harry Dunn is black is the whole point of that bit. Don't remove "African-American" as a descriptor. Binksternet (talk) 19:43, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

That the source used has Dunn stating, "I got called a [N-word] a couple dozen times today" is good enough sourcing to describe him as African America. Carptrash (talk) 19:56, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Being called the "N-Word" does not mean that you're black. Anyone can be called the "N-Word". If you have ever played any game with voice chat, you would understand what I'm saying. He was not described by the news agency as being black. As I said before, provide a source for him being black or African American. Wikipedia is not for assumptions of someone's race. It is for factual information. Do not add back "African American" or "Black" until you provide a source for it. BBG On YT (talk) 22:31, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Yours is an indefensible stance, seeing as how Dunn's autobiography goes deep into his feelings about his African American heritage, and about how Blacks like himself are treated in the US. "Our government has an even greater special significance for some of us. For African Americans, our belief in its promise has been almost like a religion. We needed to believe." Standing My Ground, page 13. Binksternet (talk) 22:48, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Good. Now use that source in the article to show that he is African American. BBG On YT (talk) 23:14, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

Looks like you already did. Good. My point was not him being African American or black. My point was you not using correct sources to show that he was. Him being African American is a big part in that and should be sourced. You cannot just use assumption without any context. I suggest you add a bit more about his story to further prove your point. BBG On YT (talk) 23:17, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Mansa Musa. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. That celebritynetworth.com "is the first instance of mass popularization of this theory" needs a source. You cannot cite the celebritynetworth.com page itself as evidence for it, nor an NPR story that merely mentions the website's claim with no wider context. Belbury (talk) 08:03, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

How should I go about explaining that the Mansa Musa information is false? Should it just get removed instead? The information and sources provided are not viable for Mansa Musa being the "richest man" in the world. It is a completely false story with all sources leading back to the celebritynetworth.com source (which is false on so many levels). BBG On YT (talk) 22:42, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

The article already has a full section about the questionable modern claims of his riches at Mansa Musa#Wealth, and the article lead clearly says but the extent of his actual wealth is not known with any certainty.

If a reliable source has written about how the wealth claim definitely originates from celebritynetworth.com, then by all means cite that source.

If it's your own personal theory, though, it's not appropriate for Wikipedia. It may be that the claim originates from some other source and celebritynetworth.com happened to quote it along the way. Belbury (talk) 09:12, 18 March 2024 (UTC)