Hello, Azhagiya manavalan! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 05:44, 29 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

In response to your feedback

edit

I am sorry to hear that you find those "symbols" irritating when editing. Wikipedia is currently testing on a new software that can allow easier editing with a WYSIWYG editor. You can now test its preview here. In the meantime, you can learn some of these wikitext formatting here. Do stay with us!

Hydriz (talk) 10:13, 20 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

 

Welcome to WikiProject Hinduism

edit
Welcome to WikiProject Hinduism

WikiProject Hinduism — a collaborative effort to improve articles about Hinduism

Discussion board — a page for centralised Hinduism-related discussion

Notice board — contains the latest Hinduism-related announcements

Hindu Wikipedians — Wikipedians who have identified themselves as Hindus

Portal — a portal linking to key Hinduism-related articles, images, and categories

Workgroups — projects with a more specific scopes

For more links, go to the project's navigation template.

I observed your edits to Mahabharata-related articles. Upapandavas is a great first article. Few suggestions:

  • restrict your use of bold to those discussed in MOS:BOLD.
  • When referring multiple pages in ref, use pp. else p. e.g. p. 100, pp. 100-1. In term of the template {{cite book}}, pages parameter for multiple pages and page for single ones.
  • In Bhima, I see references where name and page of reference is missing. Only ISBN is given. Please fill other details.

Let me know if you need my help. --Redtigerxyz Talk 15:38, 1 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for the feedback. I have made the changes in Bhima; the 'page' option is missing in "Cite" template. Perhaps it is something for the software engineers to note, I had to do pp. to p. manually. I shall look into the Bold conditions shortly. Thanks again :) Azhagiya manavalan (talk) 05:12, 2 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Talkback

edit
 
Hello, Azhagiya manavalan. You have new messages at Talk:Bhima#Issues.
Message added 05:45, 11 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Redtigerxyz Talk 05:45, 11 August 2012 (UTC)Reply