Welcome

edit
Hello, Avashurov! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! — Jeraphine Gryphon (talk) 21:32, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Hi Jeraphine Gryphon. Please help me understand why did you remove 85% of neutral, valid and sourced information and replaced it with hardly sources one. What were your disagreement with The Zeitgeist Movement page? Avashurov (talk) 22:48, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

According to WP:ABOUTSELF, self-published sources are fully qualified for describing own internal structure and activities. Avashurov (talk) 22:48, 21 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

I suggest you take your concerns to Talk:The Zeitgeist Movement and discuss these content issue with Jeraphine Gryphon there. Shearonink (talk) 03:14, 22 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Reception section

edit

I've started a new discussion on the talk page about the discussion section. Rather that end up in an edit war, please discuss the changes there. Ravensfire (talk) 19:20, 22 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

March 2012

edit
 

Your recent editing history at The Zeitgeist Movement shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. Tikiwont (talk) 19:58, 22 March 2012 (UTC)Reply