User talk:Autocracy/Archive 3

Latest comment: 16 years ago by ST47 in topic Images

VERY IMPORTANT

infernomaster01 is vandalising wikipedia, ban him before he ruins wiki and he is hacking my account to do it ban him.

Go away Jamez21, no one wants you here. Please stop trying to get me int trouble you lying butthole Infernomaster01 12:01, 11 June 2007 (UTC)

Hello

mate why does every one keep deleting the article about worlds best oragami maker "Josh Denis", i think it has historical importance as he is the best in the world.


Hello Auto

Thanks for you offer of help that would be great

AIV

I've had dozens of AIV reports on static ips rejected for "not having any warnings today". I'm tired of it and using a noticeable way of pointing it out is justified. Nardman1 01:05, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

"Bans for edits that have been redacted should be done by the overseer, removing request" Could you explain what this means? JuJube 01:15, 2 May 2007 (UTC)

Good Luck

Good luck on your exams and thank YOU for the archive on my talk page!!!! Zerorules677 16:32, 02 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks For Being Understanding, You RULE, unlike all the others who just removed it

Awesome!!!

Thanks so much for your work in creating a bot for the vandalism study!!!! I greatly appreciate it and it should make our work much easier. I can't thank you enough! Remember 20:47, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

I just saw the sample and it looks great! Great work!!! Remember 22:24, 17 May 2007 (UTC)

RE:

If the vandalism is particularly severe, even on the first offense, I usually issue a {{subst:uw-vandalism3}}. ~ ΜΛGиυs ΛΠιмυМ ≈ √∞ 23:27, 30 May 2007 (UTC)

Study can begin

Auto,

Could you use your bot to pull the information on the edit numbers below and put it into a table similar to the one that you displayed so that we can start the current vandalism study? Remember 15:27, 2 June 2007 (UTC).

I used this web site

Here is the list of 1000 random edit numbers


Snipped for sanity... permalink to last revision --Auto(talk / contribs) 03:45, 4 June 2007 (UTC)


Question

Do you think I'm qualified to adopt someone?  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:33, 03 June 2007 (UTC)

Yay. Thanks for answering my question!!!!  ThinkBlue  (Hit BLUE) 22:40, 04 June 2007 (UTC)

Cool - use your own numbers

I'm happy with you using your own numbers, I wasn't sure if you needed mine or coould create your own. I will revise the page to reflect this. Remember 12:54, 4 June 2007 (UTC).

I saw your data sets. They look great. But could you revise the bot to just pull numbers from the month of May 2007 (i.e. after the last edit in April, edit number 127285389 before the first edit in June edit number 134959730. We had changed the study plan to just do May 2007 edits because we want to be able to tell the know the difference in size of the article in bytes (which is a new feature only available for May edits). Let me know what you think. Remember 13:02, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Seems like you already saw (according to your comment on my talk page). Yes, please re-run the program and gather information just for May 2007. Thanks a lot! Remember 13:04, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
Can your program tell us the change in the size of the article in bytes based upon the edit (e.g. Edit number 4530345 increased article size by 200 bytes)? If not, I would rather stick to analyzing May so that we can put this in by hand, but if your bot can do this, then we could just analyze 2006 data or any other period. On a side note, maybe we should move this conversation to the talk page on Study 2. Remember 13:24, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you sir.

Thanks for catching and reverting vandalism on my user page. —MrSomeone ( tlkcntrb ) 01:36, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:The Phrase That Pays Cover.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:The Phrase That Pays Cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 06:51, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Added a string to make the bot happy... --Auto(talk / contribs) 11:46, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

WP:RFBOT

Your recent bot approvals request has been approved. Please see the request page for details. When the bot flag is set it will show up in this log. If you wish to expand the bot's functions to something other than the vandalism studies stuff mentioned on the request page, you need separate bot approval. —METS501 (talk) 20:24, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Tagging Bot

This should probably go somewhere in WP:BOTS, but you just completed it for me so I though I'd ask you instead:

I forgot a stub template when I asked you to tag all those stubs with the {{WPMAN}} template. Could you please tag talk pages of all articles that include the {{Manitoba-airport-stub}} template? Thanks, if not I'll go back to Betacommand and ask him to do it. No problem if you can't. :) GrooveDog 00:31, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

Ishkur's Guide to Electronic Music

It's been tagged for deletion again. If you have specific sources as to its notability, do you want to drop in and provide them? I don't know the subject, I'm just a blow-in. :-)--SarekOfVulcan 16:11, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Toolserveraccount

Hello Autocracy,
please send your real-name, your wikiname, your prefered login-name and the public part of your ssh-key to  . We plan to create your account soon then. --DaB.

Non-free use disputed for Image:UsmLogo.gif

  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:UsmLogo.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:51, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Non-free use disputed for Image:UsmHuskies.gif

  This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:UsmHuskies.gif. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted after seven days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 01:51, 24 July 2007 (UTC)

Images

I've undeleted the two images you requested. --ST47Talk·Desk 10:48, 7 August 2007 (UTC)

Smile