Your submission at Articles for creation: Hillary Goldhar (December 7)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
David.moreno72 01:31, 7 December 2019 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, AustinRichardson29! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 01:31, 7 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

December 2019

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit you made to Dora the Explorer, did not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 22:09, 11 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Baby Einstein. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. General Ization Talk 22:17, 11 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Ramona Gilmour-Darling. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Elizium23 (talk) 05:18, 15 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Doug Boyd. General Ization Talk 16:54, 24 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Sally Cahill. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. General Ization Talk 23:20, 30 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia. General Ization Talk 23:20, 30 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 23:32, 30 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

Logged-out edits

edit

As you've been blocked for adding unsourced content before, logging out to continue to do so is considered an illegitimate use of multiple accounts and will result in further sanctions.-- Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 21:25, 13 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

Draft:Hillary Goldhar concern

edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Hillary Goldhar, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:33, 9 May 2020 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Hillary Goldhar

edit
 

Hello, AustinRichardson29. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hillary Goldhar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:18, 8 June 2020 (UTC)Reply