Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (June 5)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jeraphine was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
— Jeraphine (talk) 17:15, 5 June 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Asokasb, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Jeraphine (talk) 17:15, 5 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Test?

edit

"So I put this piece as a test." -- what do you mean? What are you testing? Your message to me didn't make a lot of sense.

"I do not believe in encyclopedic articles" -- I don't know what you're trying to say with that but I think it clearly says that Wikipedia is not the right place for you. We only take encyclopedic articles here. — Jeraphine (talk) 17:54, 5 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Moved comments from sandbox talk page

edit

Dear Jeraphine Thanks for your comments. I am not in for BIG articles (it used to be my weakness). I was looking for some space for tiny creations. It is in line with 'Small is beautiful' concept. I am looking for 'Minipedia' as opposed to 'Megapedia' of Wikipedia. You are currently doing an excellent job BUT it does not have space for BUSY SOULS.

In management STYLE (not advertisement style) I / we try to get the message across in minutes, 5 minutes, the most. I suppose I will visit YOU when time is right. Sorry for taking YOUR time. PS. Even this message ssems long for me. Please keep trying. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Asokasb (talkcontribs)

There is no message in your "draft", it's just word salad. Do you understand that Wikipedia is an encyclopedia and only accepts encyclopedic articles? Those articles can be short, they can even be as short as "Ghrhdt is a village in Ythhh, XY." -- because that would be encyclopedic content. You can't host your "tiny creations" on Wikipedia, not even in your own userspace, because that is not the purpose of this website. — Jeraphine (talk) 05:21, 7 June 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of User:Asokasb/sandbox

edit
 

A tag has been placed on User:Asokasb/sandbox requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section U5 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to consist of writings, information, discussions, and/or activities not closely related to Wikipedia's goals. Please note that Wikipedia is not a free Web hosting service. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. — Jeraphine (talk) 05:26, 7 June 2015 (UTC)Reply