Welcome!

edit

Hi Asdf;jldsafdl! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! AntiDionysius (talk) 18:34, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you so much for these amazing tips! I am indeed planning to overstay my welcome. I hope all goes well for you. Asdf;jldsafdl (talk) 18:38, 29 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Aglaé de Gramont has been accepted

edit
 
Aglaé de Gramont, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

– Joe (talk) 09:18, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thank you so much, this has seriously made my day! I wish you the best. You don't understand how happy I am right now. Hectorvector27 16:22, 2 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

October 2024

edit

  Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. However, please do not use unreliable sources such as blogs, wikis, personal websites, and websites and publications with a poor reputation for checking the facts or with no editorial oversight. These sources may express views that are widely acknowledged as pushing a particular point-of-view, sometimes even extremist, being promotional in nature, or relying heavily on rumors and personal opinions. One of Wikipedia's core policies is that contributions must be verifiable through reliable sources, preferably using inline citations. If you require further assistance, please look at Help:Menu/Editing Wikipedia, or ask at the Teahouse. Thank you. Nikkimaria (talk) 18:46, 12 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Corisande de Gramont (October 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Memer15151 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
UserMemer (chat) Tribs 14:36, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Asdf;jldsafdl! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! UserMemer (chat) Tribs 14:36, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Corisande de Gramont has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Corisande de Gramont. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 17:56, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Corisande de Gramont (October 13)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 21:32, 13 October 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your username/Signature

edit

While there is no absolute requirement for the two to match it is usual for some overlap to be present (see mine). The reason is that it makes conversations easier. Please give this a little thought. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 18:02, 14 October 2024 (UTC)Reply