Asdf12356
| This user is a student editor in California_Polytechnic_State_University,_San_Luis_Obispo/Gender,_Race,_Culture,_Science,_Technology_(Fall_2018) . |
Welcome!
edit
Welcome to Wikipedia, Asdf12356! Thank you for your contributions. I am Geartooth and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- Introduction
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- How to write a great article
- Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Geartooth Friendship is Magic! 04:46, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
Asdf12356, you are invited to the Teahouse!
edit
|
Hi Asdf12356! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:06, 27 September 2018 (UTC) |
Welcome!
editHello, Asdf12356, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Ian and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
|---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:04, 31 October 2018 (UTC)
Peer Review (Beth Strutz)
editThe current outline/organization of your article seems very clear, and divides the relevant information well. You also included very precise information and sources regarding his accomplishments in science. Moving forward, it might be beneficial to go back and look at some of the phrasing of certain sentences. Transitions and extra words like "thereafter," "indeed," or "himself" make it easier to read, but also change the tone towards more of an essay, rather than an encyclopedia article. Along the same lines, some of your descriptions might be passing judgement, like the phrase "enormous discovery." Being mindful of phrasing and making statements rather than judgement would really help bring your article to the next level! I can tell you put a good amount of effort into understanding the more complicated scientific details, and presenting them in a clear manner, which really helps to bring more depth into the article (rather than just mentioning surface biographical details). Overall, this is a really strong article and I'm interested to see the final product. Bethstrutz (talk) 23:04, 12 November 2018 (UTC)
Peer review response Thanks for the feed back, I will try to make the language more neutral. Good Luck on your article!
Article issues
editYour additions to the César Milstein article include passages copied verbatim or nearly verbatim from a non-free source. This was detected by automatic plagiarism detection software. For copyright reasons, your entire contribution was deleted. Please review the Plagiarism and Copyright training module before proceeding further. Thanks. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:58, 20 November 2018 (UTC)
TheFamousPeople.com as a source
editHi Asdf12356. I noticed that you recently used thefamouspeople.com as a source in César Milstein. Please note that there is general consensus that thefamouspeople.com does not meet the reliable sourcing criteria for such information. (Discussions here and here). Browsebiography.com and sunsigns.org, which you also used, appear similarly unreliable. If you disagree, let's discuss it. Thanks. --Ronz (talk) 21:38, 6 December 2018 (UTC)