October 2015 edit

  Hello, I'm Smsarmad. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Jumma Khan Marri without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I have restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SMS Talk 11:14, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: artists ego PAGE (October 10) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MatthewVanitas was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
MatthewVanitas (talk) 11:24, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Artistsego, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 11:24, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

October 2015 edit

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Jumma Khan Marri, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. SMS Talk 11:27, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

Hello, Artistsego, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Jumma Khan Marri does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Below are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  220 of Borg 11:44, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Jumma Khan Marri, you may be blocked from editing. 220 of Borg 11:46, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: artists ego PAGE (October 10) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kethrus was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
--  Kethrus |talk to me  13:38, 10 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, User:Artistsego/sandbox/artists ego PAGE edit

 

Hello, Artistsego. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "sandbox/artists ego PAGE".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:46, 13 April 2016 (UTC)Reply