AnniceC

Welcome!

		Hello, AnniceC, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Thanks for coming to our into session at the University today. You might be interested in the project page of the Guild of Copyeditors and to check out this list of the latest articles identified as being in need of English improvements. And because you said you like bikes, you might wish to visit one of our 2000 'WikiProjects' - in this case, WP:Project Motorcycles! Should you be interested in helping to redress the balance of articles about women, you might wish to consider joining our Women in Red project. Less than 18% of biographies here are about women - and you could help us increase this! Here are some pages you might find helpful: Useful Wikipedia links: Wikipedia:Introduction Your first article Referencing for beginners Simplified Manual of Style The five pillars of Wikipedia The Wikipedia Adventure (fun interactive tour) Links for Women in Red project: Ten simple rules for creating women's biographies Wikipedia:Writing about women Editing biographies of living persons Resources page for Women in Red project List of notable women who don't yet have an article on Wikipedia Dates for future online 'editathons' and real-world gatherings
		I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox. Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) This automatically inserts your name and the date. If you get stuck, please see our help pages. If you can't find what you are looking for there, feel free to ask at the Teahouse or at the Women in Red project's Talk Page. Alternatively, contact me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help you. Again, welcome! Nick Moyes (talk) 16:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)

Hey Girl, Hey...

Is this stupid? Yes! Are we going to keep doing it? Also Yes!! xx — Preceding unsigned comment added by GoldVine5 (talk • contribs) 10:00, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Hello from me!

Thank you for coming along today. Don't forget to do the Sandbox tutorial in the Dashboard, and I'll see you next week! Cbderbylib (talk) 12:24, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Copyeditor's Barnstar
	A copyeditor barnstar for you, for a great start! Cbderbylib (talk) 12:28, 5 February 2019 (UTC)

Feedback for Marjorie Cottle article:

Feedback for Marjorie Cottle article:

The article was generally well written, though some prosaic language was used and could be altered using a more neutral tone. The lead section was brief, clear, and nicely summarised her achievements without bias. The structure of the article was well organised, but general consensus suggested that the 'Marriage' section could be included within another section, to eliminate single-sentence sections. Most sections were of equal weight excluding those that contained statistics and other extra information which helped with the flow of the article. Wikilinks were used well, more could be added but are not necessary. The article did contain some opinionated/ persuasive language (eg. 'Even [she gave up]' in the Later Life section). To correct this, a more neutral tone should be adopted whilst editing. There appeared to be little to no criticism to counteract the positives - did she get any professional critiques (sexist or otherwise)? A good variety of references were used, and no noticeable copyright violations - is there a copyright-free image available? Again, subjective/ value statements were used, mostly in relation to citations/ quotes, but some could be removed. GoldVine5 (talk) 11:39, 26 March 2019 (UTC)