Hello, Anne Guedes, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions to this free encyclopedia. If you decide that you need help, check out Getting Help below, ask me on my talk page, or place {{Help me}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) or by clicking if shown; this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field with your edits. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Jim1138 (talk) 07:14, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
Getting started
Getting help
Policies and guidelines

The community

Writing articles
Miscellaneous

August 2012

edit

  Hello, I'm Jschnur. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Response to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Jschnur (talk) 00:32, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Madeleine McCann

edit

Wikipedia needs to be verifiable. Please do not add unsourced content as you did to Madeleine McCann. Please see reliables sources and wp:citing sources. Please feel free to peruse the welcome section that I added above. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 07:14, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply

Your edits a Response to the disappearance of Madeleine McCann

edit

In an edit summary yiou wrote: "Could you at least read the BBC article and see that the police there is the PJ, not the GNR."

Please note: The article does not say the GNR's eventual finding was abduction. The sentence that you are changing refers to what the GNR told the media in the hours after they were at the scene, and confirms that at that time they were working on the abduction theory. It remains a verifiable fact that they told the media (as reported by a reliable source) the BBC (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/6627605.stm) on 5 May, that "... the disappearance of a three-year-old British girl from a Portuguese holiday resort say it appears she has been abducted." That is what the article says.

In the very next sentence, the article says, "After further investigation, the Polícia Judiciária (Portuguese criminal investigation police) subsequently stated that there was a strong hypothesis that she might have died in her room."

Please understand that the article says, quoting reliable sources, what the GNR thought in the hours after the disappearance and also what the PJ thought later. It does not say that the was the final conclusion of either organisation. In creating a chronological account of what happened, we need to say what happened as it happened. Harry the Dog WOOF 09:08, 2 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

February 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Josh3580. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Disappearance of Madeleine McCann, but you didn't provide a source. I’ve removed it for now, but if you’d like to include a citation to a reliable source and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks, Josh3580talk/hist 18:46, 6 February 2013 (UTC)Reply


Re: Disappearance of Madeleine McCann

edit
 
Hello, Anne Guedes. You have new messages at Josh3580's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Josh3580talk/hist 19:32, 6 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Harry the Dog WOOF 19:57, 6 February 2013 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello, Anne Guedes. You have new messages at Josh3580's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.


Josh3580talk/hist 20:26, 6 February 2013 (UTC)Reply