Ankiri

Welcome!

Hello, Ankiri, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as File:Leonidas Famelis.jpg, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

• Your first article
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Biographies of living persons
• How to write a great article
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Whpq (talk) 12:12, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Leonidas Famelis.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Leonidas Famelis.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Whpq (talk) 12:12, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (May 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Ankiri/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Ankiri/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

David.moreno72 12:34, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Ankiri! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 12:34, 16 May 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Leonidas Famelis.jpg

A tag has been placed on File:Leonidas Famelis.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F9 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the file appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use it — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Majora (talk) 19:23, 3 June 2018 (UTC)

June 2018

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

---

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

---

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

~ Rob₁₃^Talk 12:46, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ankiri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Wrong choice on evidence. Thanks for your time!

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 14:56, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ankiri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

We love Wikipedia ,Of course I understand why you blocked my choice. As I told you I used wrong evidence, wrong choice on evidence. There is an option (2nd one) which It will convince you. We are fan club we work for this person. Thanks again for your time! We also know css so we can do very nice articles here. Thanks again Ankiri (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

You have admitted that this account is an account that is being used by multiple people to edit articles. This is explicitly not allowed on Wikipedia. There was no "wrong evidence or wrong choice" as you put it. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:04, 4 June 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ankiri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I said we love Wikepedia. I did not said we have multiple accounts. This is not my words this is your words. So the fact that I use Wikipedia to write an article for a famous person this will be a duty for you to help me, to help fan club for a popular person. Unfortunately for some reason we do not know..... we have to face a not fair behaviour from you and this is against wikipedia too. Anyway, we will see what we can do. Ankiri (talk) 01:52, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

"We are an club we work for this person" is an open statement that this is a shared account. Wikipedia does not allow shared or "group" accounts. Thus the account will not be unblocked. Huon (talk) 03:04, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ankiri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

The fact that we have a fan club, that does not mean that we use group accounts as you said. I write the article by myself. This is extremely - not fair - behaviour for my first article. You do not help at all. As for the sentence "We work for that person" that means we are a fan club, "WE" like to merge our knowledge to make perfect articles for our artists but I use only one account, my account . There are not "group accounts" , there are not "multiple accounts" this is just me but as a fun club we try to make the best for our artists. Anyway, you should think about helping , not rejecting. Check also these rules 1. Be polite, and welcoming to new users 2. Do not attack other users Ankiri (talk) 03:41, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

It's clear that you haven't taken any time to understand how Wikipedia works before trying to edit here, so let me give you some simple advice. You will not be unblocked until we are convinced that doing so will benefit Wikipedia. In order to convince us of this, you'll need to show that you understand several of Wikipedia's key policies. Therefore, in your own words, please explain notability, verifiability, conflict of interest and copyright violations. If you can show to our satisfaction that you understand and will abide by these policies you are far more likely to be unblocked. Yunshui ^雲_水 07:49, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ankiri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Of course I can write you a few thing about it: Notability: Notability is a prominent or notable person! Verifiability: Is an evidence that you tell truth. A prove for your article (if it is 100% verified!) Conflict of interest : This is very important to Wikipedia and to me , that's why I will never reveal the identify of editors against their wishes! It is on Wikipedia's policy. Copyright violations: That means that I have to write artciles under terms of Wikipedia. Legal articles.Because non-free content, is a copyright violation. I understand the rules but you should unblock me and help me to write fantastic articles about our notable and polular artists. Thanks Ankiri (talk) 13:12, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Frivolous request that doesn't address the reason why you're blocked. You may appeal via UTRS, but I suggest you actually come up with valid reasons to convince us to unblock. - Penwhale | ^{dance in the air and follow his steps} 09:55, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your use of the word we and our suggests that this is an account that is shared. Shared accounts are not allowed. Lavalizard101 (talk) 11:01, 9 June 2018 (UTC)

I can't decline this request as I've already declined above, but given that these answers show very clearly that you haven't even read the relevant policies (I even linked to them in my earlier decline) I am removing your access to this talkpage to prevent further timewasting appeals. Yunshui ^雲_水 10:35, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Ankiri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #21903 was submitted on Jun 24, 2018 02:43:34. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 02:43, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Ankiri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #21905 was submitted on Jun 24, 2018 17:40:48. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 17:40, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Ankiri (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

UTRS appeal #21907 was submitted on Jun 24, 2018 18:50:26. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 18:50, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

UTRS Admin note: Due to repeated unsuccessful appeals, UTRS access has been withdrawn for 6 months. Ankiri has been provided with Arb Com details should they wish to make a further appeal.--5 albert square (talk) 13:21, 25 June 2018 (UTC)