Anjney11

December 2020

Hello, I'm Donner60. I noticed that in this edit to Linc Pen & Plastics, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Donner60 (talk) 06:08, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Sorry sir. I really apollogise for it. I did it by mistake. Anjney11 (talk) 06:10, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Sir what will happen if somebody puts wrong information in Wikipedia? Anjney11 (talk) 06:22, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

Anjney11, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Anjney11! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Lectonar (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:05, 6 December 2020 (UTC)

September 2022

Hello, I'm ManaliJain. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be irrelevant to the article or violated the image use policy. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. ManaliJain (talk) 05:55, 25 September 2022 (UTC)

October 2022

Please do not add commentary, your own point of view, or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. ManaliJain (talk) 06:31, 3 October 2022 (UTC) Even if I update to a recent image, it gets reverted.

November 2022

Your recent editing history at Kiara Advani shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Krimuk2.0 (talk) 07:28, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

Additionally, quality is a higher priority than recentness. We certainly do not swap out a high-quality photo for a poor one that is a few years newer. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 16:44, 10 November 2022 (UTC)

We don't need to add every available photo of a subject to an article, especially low-quality blurry photos like this one. You are close to being topic-banned from adding photos unless you stick to seeking consensus on talk pages. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:27, 10 November 2022 (UTC)