Your submission at Articles for creation: Darband town (October 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Phuzion was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Phuzion (talk) 14:17, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Anima303! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Phuzion (talk) 14:17, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Darband town (October 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by RetroCraft314 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
<RetroCraft314 /> 16:15, 26 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Bakrabad village moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Bakrabad village. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Comr Melody Idoghor (talk) 04:28, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Help

edit

hello, @Idoghor Melody: can you help me to move Karimabad, Chitral to Karimabad, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa because there is single Karimabad in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan.Anima303 (talk) 04:32, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

October 2023

edit

  Please stop. If you continue to move pages to bad titles contrary to naming conventions or consensus, as you did at Kuh, Chitral, you may be blocked from editing. Wikishovel (talk) 04:40, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

please this is located in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa check it from internet Anima303 (talk) 04:41, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Then propose the move, and get consensus for the change: see WP:RMCM. Wikishovel (talk) 04:47, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Karimabad, Chitral. Stop trying to cut/paste the article. It can only be renamed following a discussion. Favonian (talk) 07:56, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Karimabad, Chitral, you may be blocked from editing. Wikishovel (talk) 15:44, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Help

edit

i want to move Karimabad, Chitral to Karimabad, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa is somebody can help me?? Anima303 (talk) 04:43, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Propose the move, and get consensus for the change: see WP:RMCM. Wikishovel (talk) 04:47, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
yes please move Karimabad Chitral to Karimabad, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa because there is single Karimabad in Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Pakistan region Anima303 (talk) 04:49, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Now that there is a proposed move posted, you'll need to wait for the discussion (if any appears) to close. This move you are proposing has been tried before. It seems like a lot of fuss over which containing entity should be attached to the name. When the move is done, there will still need to be a redirect. It would be a lot better if you could improve the article so it's not such a tiny thing. — jmcgnh(talk) (contribs) 05:19, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Darband (town) moved to draftspace

edit

Thanks for your contributions to Darband (town). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Wikishovel (talk) 05:26, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Meragram moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Meragram, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 09:13, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Darband town (October 27)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 09:53, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hello, Anima303. Thank you for your work on Gobor Valley. User:Lightburst, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Thanks for the article. I hope you will continue to expand it.

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Lightburst}}. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Lightburst (talk) 14:03, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

@Lightburst:. Please support Karimabad Chitral to get move Karimabad Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
Anima303 (talk) 16:22, 27 October 2023 (UTC).Reply
FYI: It can be considered WP:CANVASSING if you ask editors to ivote, especially if you ask them to ivote in a specific way. It can get you blocked from editing so please do not do that. Lightburst (talk) 21:39, 27 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Darband town (October 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Phuzion was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Phuzion (talk) 03:00, 28 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

October 2023 - again

edit

  Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Buni, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 09:06, 29 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Bakrabad, Pakistan has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bakrabad, Pakistan. Thanks! signed, 511KeV (talk) 16:47, 30 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Drasun moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Drasun, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 05:15, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Besti moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Besti, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 05:18, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Afsik moved to draftspace

edit

An article you recently created, Afsik, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Dan arndt (talk) 05:20, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Barenis, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Jaipal. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Article moved to draftspace

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. A page you recently created, Guido Leoni (director), may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it has been moved to where you can continue to work on it. Please consider using the Article Wizard or the Articles for Creation procedure. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read "Your first article". You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. CycloneYoris talk! 07:07, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Besti (October 31)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Maliner was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Maliner (talk) 09:45, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anima303 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

please unblock only ip talk:37.111.190.219 talkpage Anima303 (talk) 04:07, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

No, we won't unblock any IP to allow you to further evade your block. Please speak to the reason for the block- sockpuppetry. 331dot (talk) 08:30, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Anima303 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

please unblock my account which is not involved with Najaf ali bhayo account you can check the password of my other accounts and Najaf ali Bhayo account password ip email and other informations from CheckUsers.

Decline reason:

  Confirmed sockpuppetry based on the checkuser data I looked at. Yamla (talk) 14:35, 2 November 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.