Andrewjbm

This is Andrewjbm's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: British Cryogenics Council (November 4)

Latest comment: 1 year ago3 comments2 people in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Large sections of this are unsourced and other sections sourced to the org itself. Sourcing needs to be better.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:British Cryogenics Council and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 18:44, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hi Stuart,

Since the first draft of this page, a number of additional references have been added. There are 20 sources cited, of which only two are the org itself. The rest are independent sources (Institute of Physics, Royal Society, IEEE, various textbooks and peer-reviewed scientific articles, etc.). Could I just confirm that your comment requires further sources adding?

Are there particular sections that you consider need additional sources referencing? 2A02:C7E:274D:9100:1447:51BD:88C2:D012 (talk) 18:49, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Andrewjbm! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 18:44, 4 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:British Cryogenics Council

Latest comment: 3 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Andrewjbm. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:British Cryogenics Council, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 13 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Add topic