Reference on Audio mastering

edit

Andrew, I think your addition of a reference was fine; we had a similar argument over at Loudness War. I edited your addition to clean it up a bit, but I didn't want to add it and get involved in another fight over sources, so I am putting it here. However, I did delete the completely unwarranted warning tags from your page. Illuminatedwax 04:40, 24 May 2007 (UTC)Reply

Here are the changes I made:

Digital technology

edit

In the 1990s, the old electro-mechanical processes were largely superseded by digital technology, with digital recordings transferred to digital masters by an optical etching process that employs laser technology. The digital audio workstation (DAW) became common in many mastering facilities, allowing the off-line manipulation of recorded audio via a graphical user interface (GUI). Although many digital processing tools are common during mastering, it is also very common to use analogue media and processing equipment for the mastering stage.

There are mastering engineers who feel that digital technology, as of 2007, has not progressed enough in quality to supersede analog technology[citation needed], but others, such as Nika Aldrich, a well-known expert in the field, believes that upon close review of the parameters of audio as relevant to human perception, analog recording methods can be demonstrated to be "[...] incapable, however, of recording audible perfection." [1]

Ambisonics

edit

Your recent addition to the First-order Ambisonics and B-Format section of this article is good in itself. I see a problem, however, in that it duplicates material already in the section Recording techniques, and particularly in "Native" microphones. Unfortunately, I don't see an easy way to move your addition into these sections. Perhaps you could take a look at this. (If you wish to respond please do so either at Talk:Ambisonics or here.) Many thanks, HairyWombat 15:42, 28 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Hi HairyWombat, I'll see what I can do. Thanks for checking it out!

Nomination of Galina Shatalova for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Galina Shatalova is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Galina Shatalova (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Ireneshih (talk) 06:56, 12 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Managing a conflict of interest

edit

  Hello, Andrew.levine. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page Theremin, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 13:57, 31 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

  1. ^ [Nika Aldrich (2004): Digital Audio Explained; p. 97]