Nomination for deletion of Template:Football Impact Cup

edit

 Template:Football Impact Cup has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Fenix down (talk) 08:27, 22 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of 2012 Summer of Champions' Cup for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2012 Summer of Champions' Cup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2012 Summer of Champions' Cup until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 23:23, 22 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of 2013 Football Impact Cup

edit
 

The article 2013 Football Impact Cup has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The coverage for this series of friendly matches was not sufficient enough to pass WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 21:58, 25 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Football Impact Cup

edit
 

The article Football Impact Cup has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This tournament never received enough in-depth coverage from independent sources to satisfy WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 22:07, 25 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Football Impact Cup

edit
 

A tag has been placed on Category:Football Impact Cup requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 15:22, 3 April 2021 (UTC)Reply