Proposed deletion of Prism3D

edit
 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Prism3D, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. chrylis (talk) 05:21, 28 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Ok chris why does it need to be deleted? If your so smart

Speedy deletion of PlayStation Games Peak

edit
 

A tag has been placed on PlayStation Games Peak requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. chrylis (talk) 05:30, 28 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

Article tags

edit

  Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Prism3D, without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your removal of this template does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Thank you. --chrylis (talk) 05:14, 29 August 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Double Trouble (The Hardy Boys Undercover Brothers)

edit
 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Double Trouble (The Hardy Boys Undercover Brothers), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burned (The Hardy Boys Undercover Brothers). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Schuym1 (talk) 01:03, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Feeding Frenzy (The Hardy Boys Undercover Brothers)

edit
 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Feeding Frenzy (The Hardy Boys Undercover Brothers), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Burned (The Hardy Boys Undercover Brothers). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Schuym1 (talk) 01:05, 20 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

October 2008

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Matthew laaper. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:32, 17 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

When dealing with inappropriate pages, the correct action is NOT to blank them, but to tag them for speedy deletion. Blanking of a page by an editor who is not the primary author is considered vandalism, and will result in your account being blocked! WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 13:34, 17 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of American Teens Against Crime

edit
 

The article American Teens Against Crime has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication this WP:PLOT element passes WP:NFICTION/WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:40, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of American Teens Against Crime for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article American Teens Against Crime is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/American Teens Against Crime until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Reywas92Talk 19:48, 7 November 2019 (UTC)Reply