Amirtoosi

Amirtoosi, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Amirtoosi! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 17:21, 27 October 2015 (UTC)

Edit reverted

Hi, Amirtoosi, just to remind you, I reverted your edit on Dinosaur size. Next time, please browse carefully, as one of our users wrote: "One large sauropod, Amphicoelias fragillimus, was based on particularly scant remains that have been lost since their description by paleontologists in 1878. Analysis of the illustrations included in the original report suggested that A. fragillimus may have been the largest land animal of all time, weighing up to 150 t (170 short tons) and measuring between 40–60 m (130–200 ft) long.[26] However, later analysis of the surviving evidence, and the biological plausibility of such a large land animal, suggested that the enormous size of this animal was an over-estimate due partly to typographical errors in the original report.[27]". If you want to know more, go to 2014 in paleontology, click non-avian dinosaurs then click research, one of them is about Amphicoelias, or you can go to the source website there. Spinosaurus75 (Dinosaur Fan) (talk) 10:47, 9 November 2015 (UTC)

November 2015

Hello, I'm Jaellee. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Uli Hoeneß, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Jaellee (talk) 17:11, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Transfermarkt is not a reliable source

Please do not use Transfermarkt, it is not a reliable source (see discussions on WT:FOOTY here or here). --Jaellee (talk) 18:33, 20 November 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of The Greatest Players of the 21th century

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on The Greatest Players of the 21th century requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  GILO   A&E⇑ 14:50, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of World Soccer's Greatest Players of the 21th Century

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on World Soccer's Greatest Players of the 21th Century requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator.  GILO   A&E⇑ 14:51, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Your lists

I'm sorry, but lists of players that you consider the best are not suitable for Wikipedia. This is an encyclopaedia, and opinions and original research (WP:OR) are not allowed in articles. Articles have to be referenced with reliable independent sources WP:RS, and that would not be possible if it was only your choice of the players. You can post a list like that on somewhere like Facebook, as there you don't have to provide references, and your opinion is as good as anyone else's. It's not like that here. Peridon (talk) 16:29, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Ola Aina

The article Ola Aina has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced BLP and fails WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Qed237 (talk) 16:50, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Thank you for your contributions. Please mark your edits as "minor" only if they are minor edits. In accordance with Help:Minor edit, a minor edit is one that the editor believes requires no review and could never be the subject of a dispute. Minor edits consist of things such as typographical corrections, formatting changes or rearrangement of text without modification of content. Additionally, the reversion of clear-cut vandalism and test edits may be labeled "minor". Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 16:53, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Ola Aina for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ola Aina is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ola Aina until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Qed237 (talk) 23:08, 20 December 2015 (UTC)

December 2015

Hello, I'm Jaellee. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Louis van Gaal, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. --Jaellee (talk) 15:29, 26 December 2015 (UTC)

May 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at José Mourinho, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:57, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

April 2021

Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to David Alaba. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. --Jaellee (talk) 12:41, 30 April 2021 (UTC)