Archive 1Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8Archive 10

Please comment on Talk:Oncotarget

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Oncotarget. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

18:44, 6 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Red panda

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Red panda. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity/Core topics work group/Topic list

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Christianity/Core topics work group/Topic list. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 10 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (music)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia talk:Notability (music). Legobot (talk) 04:27, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

19:19, 13 November 2017 (UTC)

Wikimedia scholarships

I'd appreciate it if you wouldn't imply scholarship recipients to be part of some sort of Wikimedia foundation propaganda campaign. —TheDJ (talkcontribs) 14:18, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

TheDJ, if I wanted to say propaganda I would have said propaganda. I stated "promote". I will however happily accept your "campaign" language. The Wikimedia foundation gave wikidata scholarship (or scholarships) as part of a campaign to promote wikidata. Alsee (talk) 14:44, 16 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Metric

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Metric. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 18 November 2017 (UTC)

19:18, 20 November 2017 (UTC)

15:35, 21 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Substance abuse

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Substance abuse. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 23 November 2017 (UTC)

20:30, 27 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Political appointments by Donald Trump

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Political appointments by Donald Trump. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 29 November 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (policy). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 2 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Alsee. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

17:50, 4 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:?Oumuamua

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:?Oumuamua. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 7 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Intelligent design

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Intelligent design. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

17:58, 11 December 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Alsee, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
 

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 12713 pages. Please consider reviewing even just a few pages each day! If everyone helps out, it will really put a dent in the backlog.
  • Currently the backlog stretches back to March and some pages in the backlog have passed the 90 day Google index point. Please consider reviewing some of them!

Outreach and Invitations:

  • If you know other editors with a good understanding of Wikipedia policy, invite them to join NPP by dropping the invitation template on their talk page with: {{subst:NPR invite}}. Adding more qualified reviewers will help with keeping the backlog manageable.

New Year New Page Review Drive

  • A backlog drive is planned for the start of the year, beginning on January 1st and running until the end of the month. Unique prizes will be given in tiers for both the total number of reviews made, as well as the longest 'streak' maintained.
  • Note: quality reviewing is extremely important, please do not sacrifice quality for quantity.

General project update:

  • ACTRIAL has resulted in a significant increase in the quality of new submissions, with noticeably fewer CSD, PROD, and BLPPROD candidates in the new page feed. However, the majority of the backlog still dates back to before ACTRIAL started, so consider reviewing articles from the middle or back of the backlog.
  • The NPP Browser can help you quickly find articles with topics that you prefer to review from within the backlog.
  • To keep up with the latest conversation on New Pages Patrol or to ask questions, you can go to Wikipedia talk:New pages patrol/Reviewers and add it to your watchlist.

If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 20:27, 12 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:BMW

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:BMW. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 13 December 2017 (UTC)

15:27, 18 December 2017 (UTC)

14:31, 19 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:International System of Units

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:International System of Units. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 20 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Tudeh Party of Iran

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Tudeh Party of Iran. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 25 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals). Legobot (talk) 04:28, 28 December 2017 (UTC)

New Years new page backlog drive

Hello Alsee, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
 

Announcing the NPP New Year Backlog Drive!

We have done amazing work so far in December to reduce the New Pages Feed backlog by over 3000 articles! Now is the time to capitalise on our momentum and help eliminate the backlog!

The backlog drive will begin on January 1st and run until January 29th. Prize tiers and other info can be found HERE.

Awards will be given in tiers in two categories:

  • The total number of reviews completed for the month.
  • The minimum weekly total maintained for all four weeks of the backlog drive.

NOTE: It is extremely important that we focus on quality reviewing. Despite our goal of reducing the backlog as much as possible, please do not rush while reviewing.


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here.TonyBallioni (talk) 20:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:USS Nimitz UFO incident

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:USS Nimitz UFO incident. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Saint Joseph

I would request you reopen the RfC topic. It seems that your main reason to close the discussion is that an editor pointed out that the article in other sources wasn't long enough. I asked them specifically to tell us what was in those pages, not how long they were (they didn't even mention how close to 'two pages' that the articles came), and received no answer. Please reread your reasoning, and then John Carter's comments that you based your reasoning on, and you will see that the only point they made is that the article is not long enough. If that is the only reasoning you can find in their comments, a reopening seems in order. Another reason to reopen is your statement in the close that "However the potential for creeping expansion is cause for some caution" as well as your mention that your close should remove Saint Joseph from the templates as well as from the core list. These points directly refer to the RfC below it, an RfC which questions, among other things, the number 100 as a limit to the number of template entries, but more importantly this is an RfC that you have participated in. This good faith participation is fine, yet if mentioned as part of your close this also indicates that you should not have closed the topic, no matter how much good faith and objectivity there were in the decision to close. Thanks. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:05, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Hi Randy Kryn. The reason I gave a "no consensus" was because the debate was too close to issue either a consensus-add or a consensus-don't-add. The head count was essentially 3 add vs 2 don't-add, which in itself is very borderline for asserting a consensus. That one-head majority is even more tenuous when the weight of reasonable-evidence is added. Christianity is a vast subject, and the question was whether Saint Joseph should on a shortlist as a core topic. The amount of space Reliable Sources devote to a topic a reasonable indicator of the how significant they consider it in relation to other topics. John Carter presented reasonable evidence that Reliable Sources were treating Saint Joseph as "less core" than many other topics. That better-supported argument essentially made it 3 add vs 2+evidence don't-add. The debate was approximately a tie. That is a no-consensus. No-consensus defaults to the status-quo prior to the disagreement, with the understanding that the issue is open to reconsideration in a future discussion. (However it is considered inappropriate to start a new RFC too hastily after a previous RFC closes.)
Regarding the other RFC, I took no position on it. I do not believe that impartially suggesting the RFC is unclear constitutes involvement. Alsee (talk) 13:29, 1 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Darwin (operating system)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Darwin (operating system). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 6 January 2018 (UTC)

16:19, 8 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Collapse of the World Trade Center

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Collapse of the World Trade Center. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 12 January 2018 (UTC)

18:45, 15 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bitcoin scalability problem

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bitcoin scalability problem. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:David Wolfe (entrepreneur)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:David Wolfe (entrepreneur). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

23:55, 22 January 2018 (UTC)

00:56, 25 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2018 in science

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2018 in science. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 26 January 2018 (UTC)

17:06, 29 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:209 (number)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:209 (number). Legobot (talk) 04:25, 30 January 2018 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Carroll Quigley

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Carroll Quigley. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 2 February 2018 (UTC)