AlphabeticThing9

A belated welcome!

Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, AlphabeticThing9. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• How to write a great article
• Editor's index to Wikipedia

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Endercase (talk) 18:10, 9 December 2017 (UTC)

Thank you! AlphabeticThing9 (talk) 23:37, 10 December 2017 (UTC)

Re: Argument from authority

Hi AlphabeticThing9 - with regards to this edit, which you undid, Category:Logical fallacies is being emptied, as noted at CfD, to allow for a slight change in the category tree. In the case of Argument from authority, the article is, in any case, already in a subcategory, Category:Relevance fallacies. Grutness...wha? 01:15, 20 March 2018 (UTC)

Two Births

The paragraph ’Two births’ gives a natural explanation of the divergence of the two genealogies i.e two boys with the same name. ‘Fringe’ isn’t an argument.--Tmajoor (talk) 20:10, 20 June 2018 (UTC)

There is a vast literature on the Two Messiahs (see Messiah ben Joseph) and on the Two Brothers (Pistis Sophia Ch.61). In the Two Jesuses-theory the "pious deduction" of ‘Mary's genealogy’ (Heli) is avoided, and his maternal grandfather Joachim established. Secondary literature on the Two Jesuses in: Welburn 1994, Childs 2005, Nesfield-Cookson 2005, Ovason 2013. Primary literature only in German (Lauenstein 1971, Zander 2007).--Tmajoor (talk) 06:35, 21 June 2018 (UTC)

Why are you claiming in an edit summary that a source does not mention the "Tale of Court Contest" genre when it does?

a recent edit of yours to the page Belshazzar's Feast has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. You wrote that "(This source doesn't say anything about "tale of court contest". It specifically states ", and. more specifically, conforms to the subgenre Tale of Court Contest:". Doug Weller talk 14:04, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

If you can't give a satisfactory answer, I am inclined to report this to WP:ANI given your earlier behaviour. Doug Weller talk 14:06, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

I'm not seeing it. Link me to it, if you would. AlphabeticThing9 (talk) 15:35, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

I already cited it, page 67.[1]

The story of Belshazzar's feast is a straightforward narrative. That it is Legend is shown by the marvelous writing on the wall, underlined by the panic-stricken reaction of the king and the moral lesson drawn by Daniel. Like Daniel 2 it resembles Aarne and Thompson's folktale type 922, and. more specifically, conforms to the subgenre Tale of Court Contest:

(1) The king is confronted with mysterious signs. (2) The wise men fail to understand. (3) Daniel succeeds where they fail. (4) Daniel is exalted to high rank.

If you couldn't see it because you couldn't read page 67, you shouldn't have claimed it wasn't in the source and editwarred over it. Doug Weller talk 16:18, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

Ah now I see, thank you. I'll not oppose its inclusion. AlphabeticThing9 (talk) 17:22, 4 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:49, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Seventy disciples, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hippolytus. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 10 October 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sheol, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hellenism.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:53, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Feral cat

Your edit summary This is based on popular science clickbait headlines which misinterpreted studies [2] is misleading because it was a journal paper being cited, and the fact that conservation biologists do consider feral cats to be one of the worst invasive species that there is is easily verified, for example by the IUCN's 100 Worst Invasive Species list [3]. Geogene (talk) 05:28, 29 November 2021 (UTC)

ANI Notice

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. - car chasm (talk) 03:08, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:33, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Shield of the Trinity

Your indiscriminate deletion action was rather annoying, since what you deleted deals with questions which many people would naturally have, so that the article is incomplete without it, or something to serve a similar function. AnonMoos (talk) 19:03, 19 November 2023 (UTC)

Then add citations. No personal essays. AlphabeticThing9 (talk) 11:38, 22 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:50, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for January 9

An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Argument from authority, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defeasible.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:48, 9 January 2024 (UTC)