Your submission at Articles for creation: Muse (December 17) edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.


 
Hello! Allan Jackson, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muse (novel) (December 29) edit

 
Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muse (novel) (March 15) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Muse (novel) concern edit

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Muse (novel), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 16 September 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Muse (novel) edit

 

Hello Allan Jackson. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Muse (novel)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Muse (novel)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 16:01, 18 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Muse (novel) has been accepted edit

 
Muse (novel), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 07:16, 3 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • I went ahead and worked on the article. I removed some information since it did come across a little promotional in tone. It was very pretty to read, but would've posed issues promotional-wise. I've also added an image to Wikipedia. I noted that you added the file to Wikimedia Commons and said that the image was in the public domain, but did you mean that the painting was in the public domain or the book cover was? Be careful about this since book covers are typically not in the public domain unless the rights to the book have expired, although if you mean that the painting is in the public domain that makes things a little tricky since book covers are still considered to be property of the publisher/author even if the artwork is in the public domain. I've asked about this on the WC help page, but offhand I would probably recommend that book covers be uploaded as non fair use files just to be on the safe side. Tokyogirl79 (。◕‿◕。) 07:23, 3 July 2015 (UTC)Reply
  • Thank you for your improvements to this article. I am pleased to have it accepted by Wikipedia. I understand from Penguin Random House Canada (the publishers) that the book cover of Muse can be used for the purpose of illustrating and identifying the book, as long as it is displayed exactly as published, with the title, author's name, and other other information on it. I hope this information helps clarify things. Allan Jackson (talk) 21:59, 13 July 2015 (UTC)Reply