December 2011

edit

  Hello and welcome! I edit Wikipedia too, under the username Jim1138. Wikipedia is written by people like you and me, so thank you for taking the time to participate. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made to Pan American World Airways with this edit, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions about editing, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Jim1138 (talk) 08:26, 4 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ray Bradbury, you may be blocked from editing. –BMRR (talk) 19:39, 5 December 2011 (UTC)Reply

August 2015

edit

  Your addition to Austroasiatic languages has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. (copy and paste copyright violation of this paper) William Thweatt TalkContribs 02:48, 4 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

April 2016

edit

  Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that you recently added commentary to an article. While Wikipedia welcomes editors' opinions on an article and how it could be changed, these comments are more appropriate for the article's accompanying talk page. If you post your comments there, other editors working on the same article will notice and respond to them, and your comments will not disrupt the flow of the article. However, keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. Article talk pages are not the place to discuss opinions of the subject of articles, nor are such pages a forum. Thank you.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 06:08, 8 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

  1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
  2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (  or  ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 22:32, 8 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

November 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Dewritech. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Nikki Haley without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dewritech (talk) 13:37, 24 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

January 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Dane. I noticed that in this edit to Chinese martial arts, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- Dane talk 02:56, 15 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Chinese martial arts, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. -- Dane talk 03:22, 15 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Shaolin Kung Fu, you may be blocked from editing. --Non-Dropframe talk 03:29, 15 January 2017 (UTC)Reply

March 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that in this edit to History of Asian Americans, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 08:17, 28 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

March 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Wefk423. I noticed that in this edit to Alibaba Group, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Wefk423 09:27, 6 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

April 2018

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Haplogroup O-M175, you may be blocked from editing. Shellwood (talk) 00:27, 5 April 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm Þjarkur. I noticed that you recently removed content from Katana without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. – Þjarkur (talk) 22:52, 5 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Katana, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. – Þjarkur (talk) 00:22, 6 March 2019 (UTC)Reply

May 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm EpicPupper. I noticed that you recently removed content from Philosophy without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. EpicPupper (talk) 16:08, 14 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I noticed that in this edit to Anna Umemiya, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:31, 22 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Anna Umemiya, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 07:35, 22 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kurt Suzuki, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Player. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)Reply

July 2021

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Ruth Fuller Sasaki. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 14:42, 23 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 14:38, 24 July 2021 (UTC)Reply

August 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm HMSLavender. I noticed that in this edit to Hiroshima mon amour, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. lavender|(formerly HMSSolent)|lambast 06:59, 14 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Pampanga. P 1 9 9   13:46, 25 August 2021 (UTC)Reply

edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Roi Vinzon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kapampangan.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 11:45, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply

Notice of noticeboard discussion

edit

  There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. --Glennznl (talk) 11:45, 2 September 2021 (UTC)Reply