some questions for reference desk edit

1)can cool gas in temperature less than its boil point in atmosphere be in thermal Maxwell – Boltzmann equilibrium ? 2)what cases the weight of gas in cylinder ,compare halo inside vacuum cylinder with 1 atm pressure gas cylinder weight . 3) how dos happen the colliding of clouds in air? 4)what is the deference between weightless condition and lying in gravity field for gas treatment and thermodynamic rules ?

--Akbarmohammadzade (talk) 03:55, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

my talk: Some body used to say something about the black holes but I prefer to say about super novas , the first one shows death and being mystery the second one is for life and being alive .it had send oxygen and carbon ,so calcium and iron --Akbarmohammadzade (talk) 05:16, 6 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Actually, a supernova is the explosion of a star. The name is misleading. It appears to us as a "new star" in the sky because the original star was too far away to be easily visible, whereas the explosion of the star is very much brighter. 5BYv8cUJ (talk) 11:15, 11 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

THE SUPERNOVA 1987A edit

the supernova 1987A had charged neighbor cloud after exploding , the best idea for formation of planets in o'ort nebula (such as now upgradesI will discuss next time about in other field )shows that this nebula was charged by neighborhood supernova for containing oxygen carbon and heavy elements

--Akbarmohammadzade (talk) 10:59, 24 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

SUPERNOVA edit

I love supernovae for their light celebrating in first appearance , their existence an_d beginning such as new star , their rule in our life an_d especially their palpitations such as our heart

June 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science. When removing content, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the content has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kurt Shaped Box (talk) 08:13, 27 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Wikipedia:Reference desk/Science has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. ▒ՅցႽ∅շշ▒ | 05:32, 29 June 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 06:09, 18 August 2011 (UTC)Reply


An introduction to studies about the effect of solar wind and solar CNO cycle on opposite rotating of Venus Author: Akbarmohammadzade Iran University of Science and Technology Email:akbarmohammadzade@yahoo.com

Your recent edits edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button   or   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 15:13, 2 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Moon. While objective prose about beliefs, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 12:31, 8 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

Misuse of talkpages edit

Hello. Article talkpages are for discussiong improvements to the article, not for general discussion about the subject of the article. And they're even less for writing letters to the subject, as you did here and here. Use Twitter or some discussion site if you want to get the attention of these famous people. Wikipedia is not a discussion site! I noted especially that when your post at Talk:Richard Dawkins was removed, with a proper edit summary giving the reason for the removal, you reverted the removal and put your post back. Please don't misuse our talkpages. Bishonen | talk 10:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC). thank you we obey when we see some guide us laws--Akbarmohammadzade (talk) 08:49, 22 February 2018 (UTC)Reply

December 2018 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use talk pages for inappropriate discussion, as you did at Talk:Donald Trump, you may be blocked from editing. - MrX 🖋 11:52, 4 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

OK

No matter, I respect you--Akbarmohammadzade (talk) 05:04, 5 December 2018 (UTC)Reply