Abirpahlwan

November 2020

Hello, I'm HurricaneTracker495. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mera Piya Ghar Aaya have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. HurricaneTracker495 (talk) 13:37, 29 November 2020 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ahemd Sabbir (August 2)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dodger67 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Ahemd Sabbir and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Ahemd Sabbir, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Abirpahlwan! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Roger (Dodger67) (talk) 13:56, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Ahemd Sabbir

Hello, Abirpahlwan. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Ahemd Sabbir, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:05, 2 January 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kanak Sarwar (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Pbritti was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Kanak Sarwar and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Pbritti (talk) 19:27, 21 February 2023 (UTC)

This blocked user's request to have autoblock on their IP address lifted has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request.

Abirpahlwan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

127.0.0.1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · filter log · WHOIS · RDNS · RBLs · http · block user · block log)

---

Block message:

Autoblocked because your IP address was recently used by "Bublifatama". The reason given for Bublifatama's block is: "Spam / advertising-only account".

• Blocking administrator: ‪Bbb23‬ (talk • blocks)

---

Decline reason: Clearly a sockpuppet, I will go block this account directly. Yamla (talk) 21:06, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

This is my only (and real) account. I logged in to that other account to help publishing their article. Abirpahlwan (talk) 21:59, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

Clearly I made a mistake and it wont happen again. Requesting to lift the block. Abirpahlwan (talk) 22:16, 22 February 2023 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abirpahlwan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Unintentionally fell into sockpuppetry behaviour

Decline reason:

If you are that reckless then it's just as well we block you. — Daniel Case (talk) 07:45, 23 February 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abirpahlwan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I shouldn't be blocked indefinitely because I logged into another persons account, that too I did only once without knowing. It wont happen again. I need to get unblocked so I can start contributing.

Decline reason:

If you accessed another person's account, that makes things worse for you and also only confirms that this is sockpuppetry. Your only pathway forward is the standard offer. 331dot (talk) 10:02, 14 March 2023 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Abirpahlwan (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

At that time, I did not know that it's against the rules to login to another person's account, when the person has given me her credentials IRL. Also, I feel the article I wanted to publish may have contained some biased views, which I will definitely revise given another chance. I had no ill-intention. Requesting to reconsider and unblock my account.

Decline reason:

There's no chance you'll be unblocked to continue writing that article. Yamla (talk) 20:32, 5 January 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.