Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Human In Khaki. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chiswick Chap (talk) 18:32, 12 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation

edit
 
You recently made a submission to Articles for Creation. Your article has been reviewed and because some issues were found, it could not be accepted in its current form; it is now located at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Human In Khaki. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. Feel free to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:AFC submission/submit}} to the top of the article.) Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Chiswick Chap (talk) 21:38, 12 October 2011 (UTC)Reply
  • Your draft article atWikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Human In Khaki is written purely to promote the book. Its purpose seems to be to tell us how great and important the book is, being full of such language as "The book reflects simple, everyday stories in a sensitive manner" and "Human In khaki leaves an impact on our society", which is the sort of thing we read in a publisher's blurb, not in an objective encyclopaedia article. Much of the praise the page gives is expressed in the form of quotes, but this does not in any way detract from the fact that assembling a list of quotes that appear to be nothing but fulsome praise is promotion. It is, again, the sort of thing we see in publishers' blurbs. Wikipedia's policy is that Wikipedia is not a medium for any form of promotion or advertising. Two different people have indicated on that page that it is unsuitable as an article because of its promotional character. Under Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, any page which seems to serve no purpose other than promotion can be deleted summarily. I have chosen not to follow that route, to give you a chance to realise what the problem is and address the issue by rewriting. However, you have not done so, but have simply added more promotional content. The page will, however, be deleted soon if it continues to exist in a form which appears to be substantially promotional. JamesBWatson (talk) 09:31, 14 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashok Kumar IPS (October 26)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved. MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:11, 26 October 2014 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Abhi0329, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MatthewVanitas (talk) 16:11, 26 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Ashok Kumar IPS (November 1)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This is apparently a promotional article for the author of a probably non notable book. Please do not resubmit in this form.

DGG ( talk ) 05:24, 1 November 2014 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Ashok Kumar IPS

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Ashok Kumar IPS requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://www.humaninkhaki.com/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. --Mdann52talk to me! 19:03, 11 November 2014 (UTC)Reply