A M. Khan

Amitabh Bachchan

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Amitabh Bachchan. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Baseball,Baby! ^{balls•strikes} 09:41, 9 August 2006 (UTC)

You mis understood.

I have nothing to say more, except that you mis-understood.

As, I haven't tried to post omething that un-balances the wikipedia or something that in nuteral.

That is an analysis, based upon reality.

Can you challenge any of the points mentioned in my article?

Rajesh Khanna

Please, Mr. Khan, do not add such personal material to actor articles. We cannot fill articles with unreferenced gossip and personal opinions. This is not a blog or gossip column. Zora 10:15, 10 August 2006 (UTC)

Please don't Delete or Remove AFD Tags from Articles

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you.

Recently you deleted without any reason the AFD and NPOV Tags from the article (Khan Habibullah Khan) that you started. Please don't do that in future until a consensus is reached by the editors on the status of the article. -- Marwatt 21:12, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

== I didn't knew the policy, Mr Marwatt, I am sorry ]]

From onwards such stupid mistakes won't be happeneing with my side, atleast.

Comment on my talk page

What do you need help with? Feel free to reply here, I watch pages I leave messages on for responses. -- The Bethling^(Talk) 08:31, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

I'm an American who helps out fixing vandalism and inappropriate edits to wikipages. I know nothing about the topic of the page, however your edits with regard to his personal assistant are not appropriate in an encyclopedia. --- The Bethling^(Talk) 08:38, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

It may have been an accident, but your your first edit today brought them back from a previous version. My revert was to remove that. I also removed a couple problem tag. Although it's obvious now that that was just a silly error, it's (inserting bad tags) a pretty common way that some people vandalize pages.

Regarding your nomination for deletion, the comment you made right under the AFD template belongs on the talk page. And, as far as I can tell you missed one step in nominating the article for deletion. I'll take care of that, but for furture reference, the steps are listed here. -- The Bethling^(Talk) 09:03, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Let me know!

Please let me know, that why you went so harsh and passed negatives comments upon me, while disussing the deletion of Salim Saifullah Khan?

Please let me know! — Preceding unsigned comment added by A M. Khan (talk • contribs) 20:11, 11 September 2006

This edit is completely unacceptible. The JPS^{talk to me} 19:14, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

And since it seems that no one has officially yet warned you, future edits of a similar quality will get you blocked from editing. The JPS^{talk to me} 19:16, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Are you O.K?

Why should I be warned for sending an article for deletion, are you O.K?

Come on have a life! Threatening regarding block won'tconvert my bravery of saying truth into cowardness.

Do whatever you like. I will do whatever is matching Wikipedia's policy. — Preceding unsigned comment added by A M. Khan (talk • contribs) 20:22, 11 September 2006

Edits like the one I have pointed you towards are not acceptable. That is why I am warning you. They are against Wikipedia's policy. Your above message is also a personal attack. This might also get you blocked. And please sign your posts using ~~~~ The JPS^{talk to me} 19:26, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Come on be a mature one.

If my editwas wrong, you must have told me atleast once instead of threatening and warning me directly.

Kindly, don't threat me, specially don't warn me. This is 100% personal attack and a sort of plan, which is to stop me from writing according to WP's Policy.

You must grow up! One Sided Person

A M. Khan 19:36, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for disrupting Wikipedia by making personal attacks. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. This block is also for some of the unreferenced claims you have made in articles, and vandalism such as this. You are welcome to contribute positively when your block expires, but further violations will result in longer blocks. Regards. The JPS^{talk to me} 06:04, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Your Comment of WP:AMARQ

I saw your comment on WP:AMARQ. Since I'm assuming that you didn't read about what advocacy is about, I'll tell you. Our job is not to decide who is right and who is wrong. Our job is to listen to one side of the story, and advice an wikipedian on the policies and guidelines. It has nothing to do with justice. Just some advice, if you are wrong, then you shouldn't be negative of make personal attacks either (see WP:NPA). Also, one last thing. The request page is not a fourm for arguement or debate. If you wish to talk to a wikipedian, use their talk page. Thank You. -Royalguard11(Talk)(Desk) 22:37, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Re your message

Hi! Regarding your email asking for help, could you elaborate a bit please? -- thunderboltz^(Deepu) 11:19, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Hello again. Thank you for the second email, but I'm afraid it didnt help much in terms of clarity. Anyhow, I've read the comments on WP:AN. It appears to me that the probelem here, is that you added a few politicians to the list of notable Marwatts, but however they were reverted by User:Marwatt. I belive his concerns were on the notability of the person. Wikipedia has certain guidlines on notability (see here) that are strictly followed by the community. Please see if your additions confirm with these policies. If yes, could you provide references to substantiate this? I'd appreciate it if you could reply on my talk page rather than by email.-- thunderboltz^(Deepu) 07:23, 12 September 2006 (UTC)

Welcome back

Hello, and welcome back. Please note that the community tends not to appreciate the blankking of talk pages. If you woul dlike to archive your talk page, see Wikipedia:How to archive a talk page. The JPS^{talk to me} 12:27, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

AMA case - Marwat

Hi, I'm going to be your advocate for this case. Sorry for the delay in responding. Addhoc 13:14, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Hi, I would suggest you list your proposed changes to the Marwat article on the talk page. Addhoc 16:48, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Removal of Tags from Anwar Kamal Khan

Stop removing Tags from the articles without providing verifiable and credible links. Consider this as your first warning on this issue. --Marwatt 02:01, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

Your request

This was discused here with the conclusion being to redirect, if there is sufficient additional information to warrant a separate article then I suggest you discuss that on the talk page of the current article. --pgk 18:14, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Your recent request for checkuser

You recently compiled and listed a case at requests for checkuser. A checkuser or clerk has requested you supply one or more diffs to justify the use of the checkuser procedure in the case, in accordance with the procedures listed in the table at the top of the requests for checkuser page. For an outcome to be achieved, we require that you provide these diffs as soon as possible. This has been implemented to reduce difficulties for checkusers, and is essential for your case to be processed. A link to your recently-created case which has this information missing is here. Thanks for your co-operation. Daniel.Bryant ^{[ T · C ]} 07:24, 7 November 2006 (UTC), checkuser clerk.

Re Will you help me be a good one?

Thanks for approaching me asking for guidence. First of all, i am serious about the coffee. Whenever you feel stressed editing just have a breack and drop by the Wikipedia:Esperanza/Coffee lounge. You may have to register yourselves at Wikipedia:Esperanza/Members and enjoy.

Now, i'll have a look at Wikipedia:Adopt-a-User program and contact you soon. -- Szvest 19:28, 8 November 2006 (UTC) ^{Wiki me up ®}

It doesn't matter if you had made mistakes in the past. The important thing is that you are willing to contribute to Wikipedia while abiding by Wikipedia policies and guidelines. -- Szvest 19:41, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Welcome to Esperanza

Welcome, A M. Khan, to Esperanza! As you might know, all the Esperanzians share one important goal: the success of this encyclopedia. Within that, we then attempt to strengthen the community bonds, and be the "approachable" side of the project. All of our ideals are held in the Charter, the governing document of the association.

Now that you are a member you should read the guide to what to do now or you may be interested in some of our programs. A quite important program is Stressbusters, which seeks to support editors who have encountered any stress from their Wikipedia events, and are seeking to leave the project. So far, Esperanza can be credited with the support and retention of several users. We will send you newsletters to keep you up to date. Also, we have a calendar of special events, member birthdays, and other holidays that you can add to and follow.

In addition to these projects, several more missions of Esperanza are in development, and are currently being created at Esperanza/Proposals.

If you have any other questions, concerns, comments, or general ideas, Esperanzian or otherwise, know that you can always contact our administrator general Natalya by email or talk page. Consider introducing yourself at the Esperanza talk page! Alternatively, you could communicate with fellow users via our IRC channel, #wikipedia-esperanza (which is also good for a fun chat or two :). If you're new to IRC, you may find help at an IRC tutorial. I thank you for joining Esperanza, and look forward to working with you in making Wikipedia a better place to work!

Szvest 19:45, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

I've created this page for you...User:A M. Khan/Esperanza. Now when you sign your name (using the 4 ~) in discussions add the following script to it e. Example ---> Szvest 20:29, 8 November 2006 (UTC) e

Stop This Drama

Please stop this Drama.

Unfortunately, you might have taken an undue advantage of a small loophole in the Wikipedia System for now but I am watching you and your sock puppets. I will keep track of your vandalization, rest assure, if no one else does.

And by the way, I accept your apology but that's not going to make me change my mind as far as the entry of Akhtar Munir Marwat is concerned. He simply does not fulfill the criteria of WP:BIO. --Marwatt 21:48, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

I am extremely greatful, thankful and kindful to you, after I have been given an apollogy by you.

But my brother and Wiki-Mate, don't target Wikipedia by talking of a loophole. If you have something against me, go ahead, I won't mind, byt calling something against WP, will surely hurt many people,that is unfair. As far as Akhtar Munir Marwat is concerned, he is quite famous and quite noteable Marwat. I agree that he dosen't match WP:BIO but I also assure you that in section Noteable Marwats, there must be a place for him, as he 100% fits for it. For your satisfaction, I can even satisfy you with full of my efforts under WP:Policy. I also would like to adivce you that instead of targetting Akhtar Munir Marwat and challenging me for his entry, you must forget personal enmity with him and his family and you must start talking in discussion page. Discussion will surely help, I assure. Believe me, at the end let me ensure, that I am having still good intentions for you, even you tried to kcik me out of WP. I respect you, because this world will end and nothing iwll remain here so what to fight for?

Regards A M. Khan 21:56, 8 November 2006 (UTC)

Mediation

This message is both for you A M. Khan and Marwatt...

Let's go step by step:

• I'll read the article and leave notes on its talk page. I'll look for POV's and unsourced material and give you my judgement.
• A M. Khan, if you have been using sockpuppets declare it, renounce it, delete them, apologize and promise it will never happen again.
• I'll be blocking anyone who does not abide by WP:CIVIL.

I hope this will ease tensions and sort out other potential problems in the future. -- Szvest 08:55, 9 November 2006 (UTC) ^{Wiki me up ®}

I totally agree with you, I will surely not be using any of the Sockpuppet, onwards. I already start logging form a different ID, since I knew it is against the policy of Wikipedia.

Anyhow, I wish if you could first discuss it on discussion page, before making any edition. You must block any one who dosen't abide by the rules. There should be nuterality, even if you ( an Administrator) dosen't obey he / she must be blocked too.

Anyhow, I warmly welcome your intrest in article Marwat. This will now make peace and allow us to enter and dlete the rights and wrongs.

Regards

A M. Khan 09:12, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

THEN HOW DO YOU EXPLAIN YOUR FOLLOWING SOCK PUPPETRY AT [1]

"Let me have the honour to interfare among you, addressing specially to User:HereToHelp. Please re-search with Akhtar Munir Marwat or replace Akhter with Akhtar. I gurantee you will find many of matches. I am politically an ally to User:Marwat but will support User:A M. Khan on the cause of Notable Marwats. Please re google and then reply. Ali Begu Khel"

Its just one of your glaring examples of sock puppetry which you just did after writing your above comment. --Marwatt 00:34, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

===I already replied on User:HereToHelp's talk page.

I lready replied it on User:HereToHelp's talk page, where you insertedthe issue for the first time.

Anyhow, now it seems that you are my Sock-Puppet, as you might be the owner of that I.D.

I assure and challenge toprove that is mine, that I.D seems to be used from other country's I.P.

Regards A M. Khan 07:20, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Please calm down guys

Khan, i've just reverted your last edit talk as it is unhelpful. The edit warring is over, the page is unprotected and i just ask you to forget and start over w/ new blood. -- Szvest 18:37, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

I will obey you, as I respect you.

From onwards, I vow that there would not be a single personal attack by my side.

I promise.

Please note down.

Regards

A M. Khan 18:44, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

I take this promise as a word and ask you to read WP:AGF. Forget about the article Marwat and start changing the behaviour if you really want to go forward as you said when you first approached me. -- Szvest 18:56, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

No problems. -- Szvest 19:19, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Will you interfare here?

Assalam-o_Alikum, Would you like to interfare on article [Marwat]? As the people are Marwat and they are 100% eligble to be having a separate article for themselves, kindly go and and help is needed. I don't care, if I have to fight 1000 times more, if my cause is righteous and truthful.

Regards A M. Khan 18:06, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Answered at the article talk page. Szvest ^{Wiki me up ®} 18:17, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Khan, please note that Wikipedia got rules and i all i do is to help the rules being applied and respected. Nothing to do w/ one's beliefs. If i see you're mistaken i'd remind you and show you how to correct that. That's all. Szvest ^{Wiki me up ®} 18:43, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Sure. So what are the subjects/articles that you usually feel cool with? Szvest ^{Wiki me up ®} 19:00, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

I will catch up w/ you tomorrow if you don't mind. -- Szvest ^{Wiki me up ®} 19:31, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

Page re-creation

You have recently re-created the article Chief Ministers of NWFP, which was deleted in accordance with Wikipedia's deletion policies. Please do not re-create the article. If you disagree with the article's deletion, you may ask for a deletion review. --Lijnema 21:47, 14 November 2006 (UTC)

S'occuper de vos propres affaires

Je sérieusement voudrais que vous restiez hors des messages de signalisation à ma page personnelle et est-ce que c'est non de vos affaires quant à qui suis moi ? Me laisser régénérer votre mémoire cependant, comme vous savez et je sais que (Ghazni Khel, Begu Khel, Lakki Marwat, Krishan Raj, Simple) toutes sont vos marionnettes de chaussette. Ainsi ne pas me donner un sermon au sujet de la vérité. S'occuper de vos propres affaires de rien d'un dieu. --Marwatt 22:47, 16 November 2006 (UTC)

By the way, how about your comment over here[2] as A M Khan and over here [3] as Begu Khel. You will find a similar sentence "Are you OK" conspicuously present in both the texts (this isn't your fault, it happens when you translate Pashto sentences verbatim in English) . Isn't that striking and obvious that poor Begu Khel even thinks and writes like you. Great job, keep it up. I am counting your sock puppets, 1) Ghazni Khel, 2) Lakki Marwat, 3) Begu Khel, 4) Krishan Raj (too much influence of Indian Movies), and 5) Simple. The edits that you do through IP addresses are in addition to that. --Marwatt 00:07, 17 November 2006 (UTC)

Pakistan earthquake

Hello

Some time ago, you cut and pasted the content from 2005 Kashmir earthquake and then put it in a new page Pakistan earthquake.

1. Please do not use cut and paste; use the move function of Wikipedia to move pages, so that its history and talk page can be moved with the page.
2. Pakistan earthquake is not in form with other earthquake articles and is an inadequate title; therefore, I am currently processing a name change to 2005 Pakistan earthquake. Just wanted to let you know.

--Peregrine_^AY 06:03, 20 November 2006 (UTC)

New Year

I Hope You Have A Happy New Year A M. Khan!!!! ¿Why1991 ^{ESP. | Sign Here} 22:44, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

I hope that you have a wonderful New Year and will party all night long. If you don't celebrate New year at this time well then happy early or late New Year and I still advise that you have a good time tonight!!! ¿Why1991 ESP. | Sign Here 22:44, 31 December 2006 (UTC)

Fazal Ilahi Chaudhry

You were probably in diapers when this happened as it was on 16th September 1978 that Fazal Elahi Chaudhry resigned and on the very same day General Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq became the 6th President of Pakistan. There was not even a day in between. I just don’t know why you are so obsessed with Habibullah Khan. If you can provide even a small proof that he remained the Acting President of Pakistan then I will accept your version but right now you are trying to rewrite the Pakistani History. You have once again started to vandalize the pages. Let me remind you - either provide a concrete proof of your claim or leave the disputed tag on the article on Khan Habibullah Khan and don’t remove it unilaterally. -- MARWAT  03:34, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

The Wisdom Fund - copyvio of http://www.twf.org/about.html

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions to the The Wisdom Fund article, but for legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted.

Feel free to re-submit a new version of the article. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later."

You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here. You can also leave a message on my talk page. -- JLaTondre 17:59, 20 January 2007 (UTC)

Hey Pashtun

Assalam u Allaikum! za Haider yam auo dair tame(time) na da wikipedia sara yao taaullaq laram as contributor, I have seen you while I was visiting Marwat discussion page. Marwats Tribe introduction page has really impressed me, I think they have been keep concentrating on article rather to put themselves on useless controversies, so dont you think a Pashtun tribe "Swati" needs you aswell, while you have already announced yourself a Proud Swati. Kindly take out some of your precious time for that great ruling tribe of the past, nevertheless you have a collection of books aswell, if I am not wrong? Haider 23:41, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello A M. Khan! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 1 of the articles that you created is tagged as an Unreferenced Biography of a Living Person. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring this article up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 944 article backlog. Once the article is adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the article:

1. Roedad Khan - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 20:40, 8 January 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Nomination of Palay Khan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Palay Khan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Palay Khan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Historianfox (talk) 10:41, 29 January 2024 (UTC)