Welcome!

edit

Hi ABBA'S BRIDE! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:40, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

Please take a breath

edit

You've been making a LOT of small edits, and as far as I can tell, most of them are not helpful. They're not quite vandalism, but they're just wrong, such as this one where you changed the date "6 January 1937" to "January 6, 1937". Both of these date forms are correct, but this particular article has the template {{Use DMY dates}}, indicating that it was first created with the European date-Month-year date format. Users are discouraged from changing this once the article has been created, but rather to keep all dates in the article consistent. This is just one example. Others of your edits have added commas where not needed, and other such silliness. I'm not sure what you're trying to accomplish, but it isn't helping the project. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:40, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

I see you have opted not to take my advice. Your editing is bordering on disruptive. If you continue in this path, I will need to take the matter up with administrators. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:01, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
I've started to mark your edits as vandalism. Please stop. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:51, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

October 2023

edit

  Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to Stjørdalselva, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:49, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at James Sik Hung Ling. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:50, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at League of Ireland Premier Division, you may be blocked from editing. WikiDan61ChatMe!ReadMe!! 20:52, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 20:54, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
  • Among all those unexplained edits were two or three positive ones--but the rest ranged from unnecessary to just plain wrong (for a variety of reasons, including grammar). Moreover, you were warned and refused to respond to other editors' concerns. If, when this block runs out, you return to the same behavior, you are likely to be blocked again, indefinitely. Drmies (talk) 20:58, 24 October 2023 (UTC)Reply
Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}}. Note that anything you post in your unblock request will be public, so you may alternatively use the Unblock Ticket Request System to submit an appeal if it contains information that must be private.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.
Guerillero Parlez Moi 21:42, 31 October 2023 (UTC)Reply