Welcome!

Hello, A-cai, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Boot Camp, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome!  Dr Debug (Talk) 04:29, 4 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Nice work! edit

Nice work on the Taiwan-related linguistic issues! – Kaihsu 14:01, 22 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Thanks, take a look at Kwai Chang Caine#Trivia about Caine's name to see my most recent work. This TV series was recently released on DVD. A-cai 14:08, 22 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello very nice work. If you are Chinese please could you help out Wikipedia:Missing articles for towns and cities with 100,000 or more inhabitants for major missing China cities. Thankyou Ernst Stavro Blofeld 15:18, 29 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Amoy (linguistics) edit

  On 10 April, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Amoy (linguistics), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 06:10, 10 April 2007 (UTC)Reply

Chai tow kway edit

Would it be appropriate to add POJ at Chai tow kway? Badagnani 00:43, 11 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I added it, because this term is valid in Amoy speech. However, the article states that the Singapore dish is based on Teochew cuisine, so perhaps an appropriate Teochew spelling should be added. Someone else will have to do that, since I am not confident enough in the spelling (I think it would be: cai3 tao5 gue2 in Standard Cantonese Pinyin, but someone else will have to verify). -- A-cai 01:17, 11 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Lei cha edit

Can you somehow get the pronunciation of Lei cha in the Hakka language? Badagnani 05:09, 12 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

The best I could do would be to look it up in an online Hakka dictionary, but I would have no way of verifying the accuracy since I don't speak Hakka. -- A-cai 12:32, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Hainanese chicken rice edit

Should this have the Min Nan pronunciation? Badagnani 18:58, 14 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I have not personally encountered this dish anywhere outside of Singapore. Presumably the Min Nan pronunciation would be based on the Hainanese variant of Min Nan which is not the same as Amoy, which is what I am familiar with. -- A-cai 12:35, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Bird's nest soup edit

Is Bird's nest soup a typical dish for Min Nan speakers? If so, can you add the Min Nan (POJ) pronunciation? Badagnani 03:07, 15 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

The POJ is iàn-o. Although it is a common dish, I don't know that it is necessarily indigenous to Min Nan speaking areas in Fujian and Taiwan. -- A-cai 12:57, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Zongzi edit

Hi, in the POJ name for Zongzi, how come the second character isn't transliterated? Badagnani 14:35, 15 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Because the Mandarin particle zi is not used in Min Nan (with the possible exception of a few loan words from Mandarin). In my experience, Bah-chàng is the most common term in Min Nan. -- A-cai 13:02, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Fascinating!

Wok hei edit

Hi, do you recommend adding Min Nan to the box at Wok hei? Badagnani 04:14, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

I do not believe this word has an equivalent in Min Nan. -- A-cai 13:04, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Har gau edit

Is this thing eaten in Min Nan-speaking areas? If so, can we get the Min Nan pronunciation in the box? Badagnani 04:18, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

That would be a qualified yes. There are a number of Cantonese restaraunts in Min Nan speaking areas. However, it is not native to Min Nan speaking areas of Fujian or Taiwan, so far as I know. -- A-cai 13:06, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Shahe fen edit

Hi, I assume Min Nan people eat Shahe fen. Thus, would you advise adding a Min Nan/POJ romanization to Shahe fen? Badagnani 23:34, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

The Min Nan word is POJ: kóe-tiâu. -- A-cai 23:50, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

OK, thanks. Am I correct in saying that, as the term is applied by Min Nan speakers in Fujian, Taiwan, and elsewhere in Southeast Asia, koe-tiau (I'm speaking here of the noodle itself, not any specific dish) is always fairly narrow (approx. 1 cm), as found in char kway teow or the pad Thai that is probably derived therefrom; in contrast to the very wide noodles used in beef chow fun? Or can the Min Nan word koe-tiau refer to any width, the way Shahe fen can in Cantonese (from the extremely wide sheets down to the thin ones, with the exception of mifen)? Badagnani 23:55, 24 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

A quick search on google images suggests that the Min Nan word kóe-tiâu (Mandarin: guǒtiáo) is more of a generic term for any kind of rice noodle (thin or thick). -- A-cai 00:07, 25 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

Well, that answers that, then! Badagnani 00:08, 25 June 2007 (UTC)Reply

TfD nomination of Template:Pop-up edit

Template:Pop-up has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Hersfold (t/a/c) 00:30, 12 August 2007 (UTC)Reply

Chinese translation of Crisis edit

For some reason your comment was placed in the article, so I moved it to the talk section.

I think you make good points, but perhaps all that is needed is a retitling of the article.

Bathrobe 10:40, 25 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Taiwanese tone edit

Hi,

There are discrepancies in the descriptions of the tones in Taiwanese (linguistics). 2 is either [51] or [53], 3 is either [31] or [11], 4 is either [3] or [1], 5 is either [13] or [24], and 6 either doesn't exist or is [35]. Are these differences in dialect, or errors? Thanks, kwami (talk) 08:52, 7 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

I would put it more in the category of "guestimations" (if that is a word). In other words, individual speakers from different areas are probably pronouncing the word out loud, then writing down the tone contour to the best of their ability. If someone had more of a "bass" voice, they may go with [13], whereas a "tenor" would go with [24]. Regional differences may also come into play.
Here's what some of the books say:

  • 閩南語辭典 (Min Nan Dictionary), page 21 (in Mandarin and Min Nan). ISBN 9578447523. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
    This is a Min Nan dictionary. I have revised the table on page 21 so that it is easier to read for a non-Chinese speaker:
tone Xiamen Quanzhou Zhangzhou
1 55 33 55
2 53 55 53
3 21 31 21
4 11 55 11
5 35 35 13
6 11 22 11
7 11 31 11
8 55 23 12

  • 國臺對照活用辭典 (Mandarin-Taiwanese Comparitive Living Dictionary), page 2691 (in Mandarin and Min Nan). ISBN 9573240882. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
    If I'm reading his table correctly, the editor of this dictionary simply breaks it down into "north" (Taipei) and "south" (Tainan):
tone Taipei (closest to Xiamen speech) Tainan (closest to Zhangzhou speech)
1 55 44
2 51 53
3 21 11
4 32 21
5 14 25
6 only in Quanzhou speech
7 33 22
8 4 5

  • 台語發音拼音基礎 (Foundations of Taiwanese speech and Romanization), page 32 (in Mandarin and Min Nan). ISBN 9578447493. {{cite book}}: Cite has empty unknown parameter: |coauthors= (help)CS1 maint: unrecognized language (link)
    This is an excellent primer on Taiwanese pronunciation. It uses the most "standard" tones found in Taiwanese speech (roughly the tones used in Taipei and Xiamen).
tone IPA
1 55
2 51
3 21
4 22
5 24
6 6=2
7 33
8 44

As you can see from the above, even the experts contradict each other to a certain degree. Of the three books, the last one tends to agree the most with my personal experience of listening to various speakers. However, you must remember that these are rough estimates, not hard fast rules. Does that help? -- A-cai (talk) 12:03, 7 January 2008 (UTC)Reply
Thanks, Acai. That helps a lot. It will be nice to have chart 2 in the Taiwanese article, and chart 1 in the Minnan article. I'll do that in a bit. Actually, it shouldn't matter if someone is an alto or a bass, as the Chao numbers refer to the speaker's range, not an absolute scale. Now that you mention reading Chinese, I realize I never even thought of checking Chinese Wikipedia. They might have some useful hints. kwami (talk) 18:08, 7 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Would you like to translate some English content to Chinese? edit

Hi A-cai,

I'm wondering you would like to help out the Spread Open Media project by translating some content into Chinese. Feel free to reply on my talk page or via email.--Ivo talk / contribs (join Project Portugal) 11:14, 31 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the offer :) Unfortunately, I already have a rather full plate of other wiki projects. Right now, I'm focusing on doing a translation of Romance of the Three Kingdoms (which, at the rate I'm going, will probably take another 20 years). If you would like a short passage translated, I might be willing to take a stab at it. Otherwise, it might be better to have someone else do it (someone who could dedicate more time to it). -- A-cai (talk) 11:42, 31 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

Hi, I hope you enjoy your time here and please also consider joining WikiProject China. Thanks! --Techfast50 (talk) 02:05, 5 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

subpages in article space edit

Hi Acai,

There's a question about the Amoy subpages: [1] Wikipedia doesn't allow subpages in article space. Were some of these just sandbox pages? It looks like there's not much page history in the negatives, for example. Can that just be deleted? Or should it be moved to talk page space?

As for the cheat sheets, you might want to join the discussion[Talk:Amoy_dialect#Page_Moves_Needed] on where they should be moved to. kwami (talk) 20:41, 8 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Little context in Ma Midi edit

 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Ma Midi, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Ma Midi is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Ma Midi, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 14:50, 31 December 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Zhao Qi (Han Dynasty) edit

 

A tag has been placed on Zhao Qi (Han Dynasty) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Ipatrol (talk) 22:33, 5 June 2009 (UTC)Reply

diasabldabusinashol!! edit

. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.175.26.132 (talk) 09:23, 2 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

Southern Min edit

We welcome your contribution to the Southern Min thread. You and I have the same opinion that it's a language family instead of a single language as most linguists put it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Xng (talkcontribs) 11:29, 2 July 2015 (UTC)Reply

Southern Min is barely a language, how can it be a language family? It's part of the Min varities. Language has nothing to do with if people can understand each other, it means having a standardized script that's actually promoted and interregional. It doesn't change the fact that some crazy people have adopted Latin letters. Right now, the Taiwanese don't even have fixed all issues for standardization. Major dialects include Xiamen, Quanzhou and Zhangzhou. If all those cities became countries, then it would be like Serbo-Croatian. --88.67.120.166 (talk) 19:52, 13 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Amoy dialect/Cheat sheet/simplified edit

 

The article Amoy dialect/Cheat sheet/simplified has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:INDISCRIMINATE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 03:49, 24 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Amoy dialect/Cheat sheet/traditional edit

 

The article Amoy dialect/Cheat sheet/traditional has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:INDISCRIMINATE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 03:49, 24 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:43, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Amoy dialect/Negative particles/simplified edit

 

The article Amoy dialect/Negative particles/simplified has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is quite a few things, but encyclopedic it's not.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:40, 13 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Amoy dialect/Negative particles/traditional edit

 

The article Amoy dialect/Negative particles/traditional has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not encyclopedic.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:43, 13 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

"Amoy dialect/Negative particles/simplified" listed at Redirects for discussion edit

  An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Amoy dialect/Negative particles/simplified and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 May 17#Amoy dialect/Negative particles/simplified until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. –LaundryPizza03 (d) 10:53, 17 May 2022 (UTC)Reply