User talk:@pple/Archive 3
This is an archive of past discussions about User:@pple. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 |
Ophelia moveYour move of the Ophelia pages was in contrary to the concensus reached on the talk page about a year ago, that the main article should be about the character and link to the disambig page. Please revert it. darkskyz 06:58, 16 April 2007 (UTC) ReplyPeaceNT has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing! → lol at your comment PeaceNT 14:28, 17 April 2007 (UTC)
Lol...I'm a boy T_TShindo9Hikaru 04:25, 19 April 2007 (UTC) Category:Defunct organizations and subcats CFDHello there, I noticed that you closed the above debate (Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 April 13#Category:Defunct organizations and subcats) as Keep, citing WP:USEFUL as justification. I have no objection to your closure, consensus was clearly against change, however you should note that WP:USEFUL is no guide as to when categories should be kept. In fact WP:USEFUL, part of Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions, is explicitly flagged up as an argument to avoid in XfD discussions. At the end of the day, whether one agrees with it or not, WP:USEFUL is simply an essay, not a guideline and certainly not policy. Wikipedia:Categorization, Wikipedia:Categorization of people, Wikipedia:Overcategorization, etc are more valid sources of guidance when coming to a decision on CfD. Best wishes, Xdamrtalk 20:33, 19 April 2007 (UTC) -- Hi Appleworm. Wikipedia:Categorization mentions 'useful' eight times and Wikipedia:Overcategorization mentions 'useful' six times. A Keep close citing useful as used in :Wikipedia:Categorization and Wikipedia:Overcategorization would seem to meet your needs, not withstanding the position of the essay Wikipedia:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. -- Jreferee 17:30, 21 April 2007 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 21:28, 19 April 2007 (UTC) MonobookI'd like to try using Twinkle, but I'm too lazy to find out about how to add the script to my monobook. May I copy from yours? PeaceNT 13:03, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
TeckWiz's RFAHey Appleworm. Thanks for supporting my unsuccessful RFA this week under my old name, TeckWiz. I'm now known simply as User:R. I hope to keep helping and improving Wikipedia alongside you. --TeckWiz is now R ParlateContribs@(Let's go Yankees!) 15:10, 22 April 2007 (UTC) User pageI remember you asked me to make a user page for you a little while ago. I'm now much closer to you than before, and I'm interested to try making it for you. Do you still want a user page? Best, PeaceNT 16:47, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
What has happened to the Elvis article?Some days ago you suggested that the Elvis Presley article needs some rewriting. To my dismay, I have now seen what has happened to the article. User:Northmeister has removed several paragraphs from the article in order to cut it from a very biased point of view. He himself states on his user page, "I've been a lifelong fan of Elvis Presley." Therefore, he removed most material that included some critical remarks concerning the singer's life. The article now reads as if it has been chiefly written by Elvis fans. There are still expressions in the article that clearly show the dominance of biased fan views:
Further changes suggest that fans now dominate the article:
Several well-sourced details have been totally removed from the older version of the article, for instance: - from the Early life section:
- from the Death and burial section (which has now been totally removed):
In the section concerning the influence of Elvis's manager Colonel Parker, which was correctly entitled Presley and his manager "Colonel" Tom Parker but is now wrongly entitled American icon, these well-sourced critical remarks have been removed:
The last passage now reads:
Significantly, this additional remark has been omitted:
The Drug abuse section is now part of the Controversy surrounding death section, despite the fact that there is no controversy about this abuse of drugs which took place during the singer's lifetime. References to Elvis's relationships and the Memphis Mafia have been excluded from the text, and the sections on The Elvis cult and its critics and the FBI files on Elvis have been totally removed. This is not acceptable. May I ask you, therefore, to have a closer look at what has happened with this biographical article. Thank you. Onefortyone 23:16, 7 May 2007 (UTC) Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBotSuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun! SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping. If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker. P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 18:21, 9 May 2007 (UTC) Orphaned fair use image (Image:Calling All Creeps.jpg)Thanks for uploading Image:Calling All Creeps.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy). If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 18:47, 11 May 2007 (UTC) Hi, and about the orphaned image above...Do you want to switch the image out for the other one? I'm perfectly fine if you want to.Shindo9Hikaru 01:41, 15 May 2007 (UTC) haven't seen you around for a week, I hope everything's fine. Are you taking an extended Wikibreak? I've sent you a mail in case you don't check this page too often :-) Miss you, PeaceNT 14:21, 16 May 2007 (UTC) Yeah, me too. I was wondering why you weren't responding to my comment above.Shindo9Hikaru 03:03, 17 May 2007 (UTC) Welcome back!Wow - you're back!! I'm so happy to see you again, thanks for the co-nom (you're incredibly fast). I'll send you an email shortly. (Hey! Wait. Have you replied to my last email?:)) Love, PeaceNT 15:54, 18 May 2007 (UTC)
:)
Thank you, Appleworm! Bye bye... ;-) --Davide21casella postale 10:51, 20 May 2007 (UTC)
|