May 2018

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Amanda Holden. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. This is Paul (talk) 23:15, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Amanda Holden, you may be blocked from editing. This is Paul (talk) 23:16, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Amanda Holden. This is Paul (talk) 23:18, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 48 hours for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf(talk) 23:22, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

85.255.237.23 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I share this IP address with my kid I will make sure he doesn’t use this again. I am very sorry 85.255.237.23 (talk) 23:27, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Nothing but vandalism from this IP. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 23:34, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

85.255.237.23 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have took the device away from him now. And this won’t happen again. Please unblock. 85.255.237.23 (talk) 23:39, 1 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

No. This totally fails to convince me. In the future, please consider using proper grammar if you wish to more convincingly portray an adult. Yamla (talk) 00:10, 2 May 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

May 2018

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.  331dot (talk) 08:55, 2 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

December 2019

edit

  Hello, I'm XXX8906. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Skepta have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the help desk. Thanks. XXX8906 (talk) 15:55, 18 December 2019 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2020

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Fast—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 18:32, 28 August 2020 (UTC)Reply

March 2021

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to JFS (school) have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:16, 3 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

December 2021

edit

  Please refrain from using talk pages such as Talk:Adolf Hitler for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Thank you. Meters (talk) 04:02, 5 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.