82.6.168.150

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create an account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you:

• Create new pages and rename pages
• Edit semi-protected pages
• Upload images
• Have your own watchlist, which shows when articles you are interested in have changed

If you edit without an account, your IP address (82.6.168.150) is used to identify you instead.

We hope that you choose to become a Wikipedian and create an account. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. We also have an intuitive guide on editing if you're interested. By the way, please make sure to sign and date your talk page comments with four tildes (~~~~).

Happy editing! Ninney (talk) 22:44, 20 March 2015 (UTC)

your edit

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Physicians in the United States Congress, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you.

There were numerous issues with your edit because you did not adjust the total number in the text, and you didnt switch out citations. these are all serious quality issues.--Wuerzele (talk) 03:19, 15 April 2015 (UTC)

May 2014

Hello, I'm Helpsome. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions have been reverted or removed because they could be seen to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Helpsome (talk) 18:21, 2 May 2015 (UTC)

May 2015

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Shy Tory Factor  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal ^talk 16:29, 6 May 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2015

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to People's Pledge, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. —This lousy T-shirt— (talk) 21:59, 3 June 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to People's Pledge. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Callmemirela (Talk) 00:19, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Reference errors on 3 June

Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

• On the People's Pledge page, your edit caused a broken reference name (help). (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:38, 4 June 2015 (UTC)

June 2015

Hello, I'm Haminoon. I noticed that you recently removed some content from List of ethnic minority politicians in the United Kingdom without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. -- haminoon (talk) 10:49, 13 June 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2015

Hello, I'm I dream of horses. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Premiership of David Cameron  with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 15:13, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Premiership of David Cameron with this edit, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (contributions) @ 15:15, 17 September 2015 (UTC)

October 2015

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistent disruptive editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 16:42, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

• Bbb23, this editor's work may look familiar to you. I've rolled back most of their edits. It's entirely possible that there's one or two decent ones in there, but for the most part it's unverified categorization porn. Drmies (talk) 16:43, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

• (edit conflict) Not at first glance, but there are so many.--Bbb23 (talk) 16:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

• Why are you reverting my edits when they are correct? 82.6.168.150 (talk) 16:47, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

I mean you just deleted a huge chunk out of the 1945 general election, so could you please go through the reverts you just made including the one to the colorado page as the information now on that page is incorrect. 82.6.168.150 (talk) 16:50, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

Your edits aren't correct, at least not the half dozen I looked at. If you'd quit socking and got legit, you could put in as many correct things as you like. And I just clicked on a fairly random one--do you have any idea how incredibly incorrect this is? It's so bad I'm going to revdelete it. No, after seeing that violation of our BLP, I don't wish to check your edits on the off-chance that I run into an acceptable one.

Please point out another edit that is incorrect as you have said that the half a dozen you looked at were not right! The edit I added on operation midland page is in fact correct since they were all mentioned in the media so I would appreciate if you re look at the edits that you have reverted. 82.6.168.150 (talk) 17:48, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

You simply added a bunch of names which weren't in that Guardian reference--and said they were accused of being involved in a pedophile ring. It doesn't get much worse than that. Drmies (talk) 17:54, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

I can provide multiple articles where their names are mentioned if you want the source? 82.6.168.150 (talk) 17:58, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

I don't want to read other articles; I want you to respect our guidelines. This cavalier attitude you have toward living people is simply not acceptable--and that goes for many of your "Category" edits as well. I'm done talking to you; you can place an unblock request if you like and have someone else look at it. But that admin is also likely to go through your edits and find stuff like this, where you turned someone into a Labour politician without any verification; you've made that edit hundreds of times from this IP and others, and I've blocked you before for the very same thing. Wasn't there an ANI discussion about this? That same admin will be guided to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Marquis de la Eirron as well, and the block by Bbb23 for socking. Drmies (talk) 23:11, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

@Drmies: D'oh, you'd think I could have at least scrolled up this page and seen that or looked at the block log or something. I should block myself for dimness. Anyway, given my previous 3-month block, I've changed the duration of this block to six months and revoked Talk page access. See ya.--Bbb23 (talk) 23:52, 16 October 2015 (UTC)

---