81.108.7.13

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might like to see:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Manual of Style

You are welcome to continue editing without logging in, but many editors recommend that you create an account. Doing so is free, requires no personal information, and provides several benefits such as the ability to create articles. For a full outline and explanation of the benefits that come with creating an account, please see this page. If you edit without a username, your IP address (81.108.7.13) is used to identify you instead.

In any case, I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your comments on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your IP address (or username if you're logged in) and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on this page. Again, welcome! Youreallycan 23:16, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

There was no need to be so fucking rude. 81.108.7.13 (talk) 23:18, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Please stop spamming WP: ANI. What you are posting is irrelevant and is now cosidered spam. If you do not stop you will be blocked. Robby The Penguin (talk) (contribs) 23:21, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Your personal attacks in edit summaries

Please stop you personal attacks in your edit summaries like "FUCK OFF" please take this as a WP:NPA warning - further repetition could result in the removal of your editing privileges - thanks - Youreallycan 23:22, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

July 2012

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Libor, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. You vandalised the whole page and gave an inaccurate edit summary to make your edit look un suspicious. Wikipedia is about truth and your vandalism deserves an only warning TheIrishWarden - Irish and proud (talk) 12:57, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

If you do vandalise again, you'll get blocked probably for a long time due to your foul language last week TheIrishWarden - Irish and proud (talk) 12:59, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

I have requested for you to be dealt with, possibly a block. Hopefully a block will make you learn. TheIrishWarden - Irish and proud (talk) 13:03, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 13:04, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Hopefully through this block you will learn. Regards TheIrishWarden - Irish and proud (talk) 13:05, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

I highly doubt it to be fair. 81.108.7.13 (talk) 13:49, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

really? I'll just get the block extended to teach you a lesson TheIrishWarden - Irish and proud (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 20:00, 7 July 2012 (UTC)

Go on then, I dare you! 81.108.7.13 (talk) 01:39, 8 July 2012 (UTC)

I can't! But just remember to be good! TheIrishWarden - Irish and proud (talk) 14:31, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. (✉→BWilkins←✎) 16:50, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

81.108.7.13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I learnt my lesson after the last block. Why have I been blocked again???

Decline reason:

Your claim that you have learnt your lesson is not in evidence. Danger! ^{High voltage!} 02:51, 15 July 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your comments in ANI, of course (✉→BWilkins←✎) 22:54, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

I don't understand how anyone could consider those "personal attacks" let alone "harassment". Clearly I was just commenting in an existing thread, providing relevant examples to support the theories of others. I haven't actually been rude to anyone. 81.108.7.13 (talk) 23:05, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Oh, so "This kind of goading from TIW is blatantly coming either from a troll or from someone with the mental age of an 8 year old" is not a personal attack? Seriously? (✉→BWilkins←✎) 23:07, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

Looks like a personal attack to me.Robby The Penguin (talk) (contribs) 23:10, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Yes! Seriously, when someone engages in "goading" behaviour, are we not allowed use any negative terms to describe it? (I wouldn't be surprised - this is what it's like all the time in loony lefty politically correct Britain...) In any case, this was a theory that had been mentioned before and I was merely supporting its likelihood. You really think this warrants a block?!? 81.108.7.13 (talk) 23:12, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

I'm not sure what "goading" behavior would be, but I do know that personal attacks are never allowed, no matter what kind the of action that might provoke it. Robby The Penguin (talk) (contribs) 23:22, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

I appreciate that, but I'm still not convinced that what I said constituted a personal attack, certainly not anything blockable. If the consensus is that I am wrong then of course I will apologise and change the nature of my unblock request. 81.108.7.13 (talk) 23:34, 14 July 2012 (UTC)

{{unblock|Well I whole-heartedly apologise for what I did, which I must accept was a personal attack. I shall certainly not be doing it again, and will instead focus on improving articles (mainly surrounding number theory) than commenting on individual users}}Request deactivated as block appears to have expired. Beeblebrox (talk) 10:07, 17 July 2012 (UTC)

Must accept, or do accept? Just a couple days ago you were saying you weren't convinced that saying someone had the mental capacity of a young child was an insult. Hersfold non-admin^(t/a/c) 21:23, 16 July 2012 (UTC)

Well it's pretty fucking irrelevant now I'm unblocked aint it! 81.108.7.13 (talk) 10:30, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Gotye, you may be blocked from editing. Robby The Penguin (talk) (contribs) 18:49, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you make a personal attack, as you did with this edit to User talk:Penguin 236. Jim1138 (talk) 19:05, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Looks like I haven't learnt my lesson have I, douchebag! 81.108.7.13 (talk) 19:19, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

ANI

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Robby The Penguin (talk) (contribs) 19:38, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Blocked

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for attempting to harass other users. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. The Blade of the Northern Lights (話して下さい) 19:55, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

81.108.7.13 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Lesson learnt. i wont do it again!

Decline reason:

You've already lost the trust of the community. Frankly, there are just too many problems coming from this IP address. Come back when this block expires, or when your ISP assigns you a different IP address, or better yet, create your own account from a different IP address. ~Amatulić (talk) 23:36, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---