September 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm Rsrikanth05. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Full stop because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Rsrikanth05 (talk) 08:11, 12 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2015

edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Zdravko Čolić has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 23:05, 21 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Rchard2scout. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Thessaloniki has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Rchard2scout (talk) 18:26, 9 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to 13 Hours (book)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Dcirovic (talk) 18:58, 19 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

June 2016

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Oolong (disambiguation) has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 19:44, 26 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

August 2016

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Gianluca Vacchi has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:19, 7 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

February 2017

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Andrey Arshavin. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:35, 7 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Blue Edits. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to 1100 have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Please note that this is the English Wikipedia so the main content should be in English. Blue Edits (talk) 07:54, 12 May 2017 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2017

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Philip II of Macedon. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. - Tom | Thomas.W talk 09:49, 3 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

See Talk:Philip II of Macedon The language was closer to Greek. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 09:52, 3 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

November 2017

edit

  Hello, I'm Boomer Vial. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Behemoth (band) have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Boomer VialHolla! We gonna ball! 11:04, 28 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

December 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm Abelmoschus Esculentus. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Reverse sexism— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. Abelmoschus Esculentus talk / contribs 10:33, 10 December 2018 (UTC)Reply

December 2021

edit

  Hello, I'm Jingiby. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 14:28, 28 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

May 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Jingiby. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Jingiby (talk) 18:54, 23 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

June 2022

edit

  Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 06:42, 11 June 2022 (UTC)Reply

February 2023

edit

  Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but your recent edits appear to be intentional disruptions designed to illustrate a point. Edits designed for the deliberate purpose of drawing opposition, including making edits you do not agree with or enforcing a rule in a generally unpopular way, are highly disruptive and can lead to a block or ban. If you feel that a policy is problematic, the policy's talk page is the proper place to raise your concerns. If you simply disagree with someone's actions in an article, discuss it on the article talk page or, if direct discussion fails, through dispute resolution. If consensus strongly disagrees with you even after you have made proper efforts, then respect the consensus, rather than trying to sway it with disruptive tactics. Thank you. Jingiby (talk) 04:19, 2 February 2023 (UTC)Reply