76.94.59.40

Hello, I'm Filmssssssssssss. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks.--Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:39, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you.--Filmssssssssssss (talk) 15:45, 12 May 2022 (UTC)

Citations needed

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Example, "still being edited by person(s) involved with the band". False, I'm a music historian not associated with any band. Also: Hoaxing Vandalism by 76.94.59.40 (without any citations) insists "In 2009, they passed on the name Breaking Point to a Miami band consisting of musicians Amanda Mallo, Patricia Dorta, and Erynn Chapman". There is no evidence of this transfer - Citation needed. According to Spotify, as of Dec. 4, 2022, Breaking Point the original trademark holder (and current active trademark holder thru common use since 4/4/01) has 149,385 streams per month. Their song "One of a Kind" has 9,703,463 million streams. Citation: https://open.spotify.com/artist/5Mmel3Q37hvWQoPBKI5E0Q. It appears you are trying to create brand confusion between the official Wind-up Records band Breaking Point (the actual trademark registrant and active common law user) and a fictitious "Miami band consisting of musicians Amanda Mallo, Patricia Dorta, and Erynn Chapman" who has no citations, stream history, photos, videos, or interviews as "Breaking Point". It also appears you're attempting to get these ladies in trouble thru Trademark infringement claiming use of a name that doesn't belong to them. Either way, please provide a single citation, a USPTO registration prior to 4/4/01, or other form of proof, or it is simply Hoaxing Vandalism which you've been warned about here in the past on 15:45, 12 May 2022. Thank you--Zandor75. Zandor75 (talk) 23:17, 7 December 2022 (UTC)

Second Warning- Hoaxing Vandalism: Citations Needed.

Once again, I'm not associated with any band. Second Warning: Hoaxing Vandalism by 76.94.59.40 (without any citations) insists "In 2009, they passed on the name Breaking Point to a Miami band consisting of musicians Amanda Mallo, Patricia Dorta, and Erynn Chapman". According to Spotify, as of Dec. 4, 2022, Breaking Point (the active trademark holder thru common use since 4/4/01) has 116,634 streams per month. As of 1/30/23, their song "One of a Kind" has 10 million+ streams. Citation: Spotify – Breaking Point It appears you are trying to create brand confusion between the official Wind-up Records band Breaking Point (the actual trademark registrant and active common law user) and a fictitious "Miami band consisting of musicians Amanda Mallo, Patricia Dorta, and Erynn Chapman" who has no citations, stream history, photos, videos, or interviews as "Breaking Point". It also appears you're attempting to get these ladies in trouble thru Trademark infringement claiming use of a name that doesn't belong to them. Either way, please provide a single citation, a USPTO registration prior to 4/4/01, or other form of proof, or it is simply Hoaxing Vandalism which you've been warned about here twice: 12 May 2022 and 7 December 2022 Thank you. Zandor75 (talk) 04:23, 31 January 2023 (UTC)

Third Warning- Hoaxing Vandalism: Citations Needed.

Third Warning: Hoaxing Vandalism by 76.94.59.40 (without any citations) insists "In 2009, they passed on the name Breaking Point to a Miami band consisting of musicians Amanda Mallo, Patricia Dorta, and Erynn Chapman". You need to provide proof of this transaction. According to Spotify, as of Jun. 30, 2023, Breaking Point (the active trademark holder thru common use since 4/4/01) has 86,340 streams per month. As of 6/30/23, their song "One of a Kind" has 11,167,794 streams. Citation: Spotify – Breaking Point It appears you are trying to create brand confusion between the official Wind-up Records band Breaking Point (the actual trademark registrant and active common law user) and a fictitious "Miami band consisting of musicians Amanda Mallo, Patricia Dorta, and Erynn Chapman" who has no citations, stream history, photos, videos, or interviews as "Breaking Point". It also appears you're attempting to get these ladies in trouble thru Trademark infringement claiming use of a name that doesn't belong to them. Either way, please provide a single citation, a USPTO registration prior to 4/4/01, or other form of proof, or it is simply Hoaxing Vandalism which you've been warned about here twice: 12 May 2022 and 7 December 2022 Thank you. Zandor75 (talk) (talk) 22:02, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

October 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Jerry Seinfeld (character)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 02:21, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

It IS constructive. And it is correct. Undoing my edit without research is what's not constructive. 76.94.59.40 (talk) 02:23, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Jerry Seinfeld (character). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Yoshi24517 (Chat) (Online) 02:26, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Uh. . . have you seen the show? This is the character's full first name. My edit is correct. We don't demand citations for the other characters' full names. 76.94.59.40 (talk) 02:28, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Jerry Seinfeld (character), you may be blocked from editing. Materialscientist (talk) 02:30, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

It isn't disruptive and it isn't vandalism. If you want me to cite sources, that's fine, but my edit is CORRECT. How do you cite an episode of the show? 76.94.59.40 (talk) 02:32, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Your source doesn't mean that's his given name. It could just as easily be a nickname. Please see WP:BRD. Now that you've been reverted multiple times by multiple editors, you need to discuss your edit on the talk page and build a consensus before it can be added. Thanks. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 12:51, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

By that logic you could say any name said by anyone on the show at any point is a "nickname," as the characters don't tend to declare "my legal name is _____" too often. Jesus. 76.94.59.40 (talk) 16:44, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Take it to the talk page. You're being disruptive, which will just get you blocked. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 17:43, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

What you're doing is actively removing CORRECT information from Wikipedia just to prove a point. Be upset with my actions all you want, but why take it out on the sanctity of the article? My last edit is a CITED PRIMARY SOURCE. What is your justification for removing SOURCED, CORRECT information? 76.94.59.40 (talk) 18:01, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

Your recent editing history at Jerry Seinfeld (character) shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 17:44, 31 October 2023 (UTC)

May 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at South Miami Senior High School, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Stop doing this. There is no reason we should not also list this alumni's real name, and he is not primarily known as a businessman. Meters (talk) 20:48, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---