Rhythm and blues

edit

Hello there. You have changed the genre listing on the Van Morrison article 3 times to use the abbreviated form of R&B. Van Morrison history I have summarized twice for you that this is a redirect and is not the correct choice for this genre, as shown in the title of the genre and in the notation that R&B redirects to that article: Rhythm and blues Assuming that your effort to edit this article with this change is a good faith attempt, I'd be happy to discuss with you why you insist that this article, out of so many others listing Rhythm and blues as the genre, necessitates this change to R&B. Agadant (talk) 13:17, 21 February 2013 (UTC)Reply

Larry McCray

edit

I have reverted your edits. You have removed a cited reference and added an unsourced musical genre(s). Please read Wikipedia:Verifiability. Thanks,

Derek R Bullamore (talk) 23:04, 19 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

And again. Any further repetition will be classed as vandalism.
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 10:14, 23 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Larry McCray. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.
Derek R Bullamore (talk) 20:47, 27 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Multiple unsourced edits

edit

Hi, I'm concerned that you appear to engage in long term edit wars, removing sourced content, adding unsourced content and perhaps original research. A lot of this involves an area prone to such issues, music genre listings at infoboxes. As well, a glance at the edit history of Astral Weeks indicates previous IP accounts have made similar edits, and received warnings for them. Taken together, all these concerns can eventually trigger administrative oversight. I'd suggest you begin to support your contributions with reliable sources, per WP:RELIABLE, and use the article talk pages to discuss any changes with which other editors disagree. Thank you, 99.136.252.252 (talk) 01:40, 10 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

May 2013

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. I have noticed that some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to Astral Weeks, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you to seek consensus for certain edits. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 01:15, 14 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Moondance, without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Dan56 (talk) 03:50, 15 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Astral Weeks, you may be blocked from editing. Dan56 (talk) 00:49, 17 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

  This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Astral Weeks, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dan56 (talk) 01:00, 17 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Van Morrison, without providing a source and without establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Please stop adding record labels to the article that Van Morrison did not record under. If you disagree, you should discuss this at the article's talk page. Please stop changing the years active date in the article with no discussion. 1967 could not possibly be correct and changing it again will be considered vandalism. Agadant (talk) 23:53, 31 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

May 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Moondance may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:06, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

June 2013

edit
 

Your recent editing history at Van Morrison shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

To avoid being blocked, instead of reverting please consider using the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. See BRD for how this is done. You can post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection. NeilN talk to me 04:38, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Stop making unsourced, undiscussed changes to Van Morrison without an edit summary. Please use Talk:Van Morrison to explain your changes. The next time you make the same change without discussing you will be reported and probably blocked from editing. --NeilN talk to me 14:48, 1 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Van Morrison, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NeilN talk to me 17:53, 26 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  This is your last warning. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Frank Sinatra, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. —    Bill W.    (Talk)  (Contrib)  — 00:39, 29 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2013

edit

  This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at List of songs recorded by Jamiroquai ‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Flat Out let's discuss it 11:47, 4 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Mark Arsten (talk) 02:22, 12 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

August 2013

edit

  This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Jamiroquai ‎, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Flat Out let's discuss it 23:42, 27 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

September 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm Tbhotch. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Jamiroquai, with this edit, without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 00:09, 8 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Van Morrison, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. NeilN talk to me 23:23, 22 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

October 2013

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at Corner of the Earth, you may be blocked from editing. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 00:31, 5 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

  This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Jamiroquai, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 00:17, 7 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Rhythm and blues. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. — Malik Shabazz Talk/Stalk 01:41, 29 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2013

edit

  This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Love Foolosophy, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 20:28, 1 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for persistent genre-warring, as done at Travelling Without Moving. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.  © Tbhotch (en-2.5). 18:03, 6 November 2013 (UTC)Reply

December 2013

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Frank Sinatra, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 23:33, 8 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Frank Sinatra. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Binksternet (talk) 00:34, 18 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Synkronized, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Dan56 (talk) 18:43, 20 December 2013 (UTC)Reply

January 2014

edit

  Please do not add or change content, as you did to Sheryl Crow, without verifying it by citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 23:52, 4 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to change genres without discussion or sources, as you did at C'mon, C'mon, you may be blocked from editing. Flat Out let's discuss it 00:08, 5 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  This is the final warning that you will receive regarding continued genre changing without discussion or sources. If you choose to continue, as you did at Feelin' the Same Way, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Binksternet (talk) 00:20, 5 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  This is your last warning. The next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at In This Skin, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Binksternet (talk) 22:39, 6 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 6 Months for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.   Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:12, 6 January 2014 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2014

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 year for recommencing the same inappropriate behaviour immediately after the expiry of the previous block. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.   —SMALLJIM  21:02, 7 July 2014 (UTC)Reply

September 2015

edit

  Please refrain from changing genres, as you did to Eamon (singer), without providing a source or establishing a consensus on the article's talk page first. Genre changes to suit your own point of view are considered disruptive. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 06:51, 5 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you change genre in pages without discussion or sources, as you did at I Love Them Ho's (Ho-Wop). Binksternet (talk) 07:28, 18 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked temporarily from editing for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 21:45, 28 September 2015 (UTC)Reply