74.221.72.198

Welcome!

Hi 74.221.72.198! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! 74.104.133.183 (talk) 15:29, 30 December 2020 (UTC)

Your contributions

Hi, Thanks for your additions here. Please include inline citations with reliable sources and do make an edit summary. It really would help your fellow editors. - Samf4u (talk) 15:28, 1 January 2021 (UTC)

January 2021

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Lance Gooden—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 15:31, 15 January 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Greg Pence, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 18:05, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. 2601:188:180:B8E0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 18:06, 17 January 2021 (UTC)

Unblock request

Widr blocked me on January 22 and cited "disruptive editing." Would you please unblock me because I did not do disruptive editing. - User_talk:74.221.72.198

April 2021

Your edit at Conservapedia was reverted because of vandalism and a unref claim. GameEnd (talk) 14:47, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

   Conservapedia is a reliable source. 74.221.72.198 (talk) 14:54, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

• • It isn't on the list here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Perennial_sources GameEnd (talk) 14:58, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Conservapedia ‎. — Czello 15:39, 15 April 2021 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor. — Newslinger talk 14:38, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

Whatever that means. And why did you get rid of my WP:RSN discussion? 74.221.72.198 (talk) 14:48, 21 April 2021 (UTC)

No vandalism

Stop falsely claiming I vandalized articles and blocking me for removing your bias. 74.221.72.198 (talk) 14:47, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Enough

You Wikipedia trolls need to stop inserting your bias into my edits, reverting my contributions, and discrediting Conservapedia. Is anybody conservative even on here? Just wondering... 74.221.72.198 (talk) 14:45, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Conservapedia

Conservapedia is a reliable source, even if you don't think so. WIKIPEDIA IS NOT! 74.221.72.198 (talk) 14:50, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Firstly, no Wiki is reliable by definition -- anyone can edit it, which makes it unreliable. But even still, Conservapedia is probably the least reliable of all the "-pedias" anyway. — Czello 14:57, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

Wikipedia is the least reliable. Conservapedia tells the truth and does not allow trolls - like YOU! 74.221.72.198 (talk) 14:59, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

If you think so, you can start a conversation about it at WP:RSN. — Czello 15:04, 16 April 2021 (UTC)

---